My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 02/13/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2001
>
Minutes - Council - 02/13/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:19:31 PM
Creation date
5/14/2003 3:16:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/13/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Hendriksen inquired as to why it wouldn't make sense for the City to hold a <br />training session which would teach a person how to inspect their septic system and then allow <br />citizens to do the inspection themselves if they chose to do so. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated that he would look into that option as a possibility. <br /> <br />Case//13: <br /> <br />Proposed Ordinance to Establish Density Transition Standards for New <br />Residential Development <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated that the purpose of the Charter Amendment that requires a <br />transition between new and existing residential development of differing densities is to mitigate <br />the impact new, higher density residential development may have on adjacent lower density <br />neighborhoods. On November 14, 2000, the City Council introduced an ordinance to establish <br />density transition standards between existing and new residential development. The ordinance <br />failed to receive the necessary amount of votes to pass during the regular meetings on December' <br />12, 2000, and again on December 19, 2000. On January 25, 2001, City Council conducted a <br />work session to continue to work on the density transition regulations. Staff presented a draft <br />ordinance dated January 25, 2001, that did not include lot tiering specifications and exempted <br />properties rezoning from commercial/industrial to multi-family residential from density <br />transitioning (in addition to properties that were zoned for multi-family prior to the Charter <br />Amendment). Loren Gordon of Hoisington Koegler Group incorporated (HKGi) presented a <br />concept that would establish the groundrules for density transitioning in a policy guideline <br />format. Staff's ordinance was eliminated from further consideration. Mr. Gordon was directed <br />to refine the proposed ordinance and guideline policy for Council consideration, noting that <br />density transitioning would apply to the entire City, not just to developing properties inside or on <br />the outer limits of the MUSA. Staff was also directed to research the ramifications of adopting <br />standards in policy format. Staff has worked with Mr. Gordon to amend the proposed ordinance <br />to: a) establish the groundrules only for density transitioning; b) make density transitioning <br />applicable to the entire City; c) only exempt density transitioning on parcels that were zoned for <br />multi-family prior to the Charter Amendment or when property owners adjacent to the <br />developing property waive the requirement; d) reference a guideline of acceptable density <br />transitioning techniques and methods that will be adopted by resolution. Making the density <br />transitioning requirement applicable to the entire City is a substantial change from the ordinance <br />version that was subjected to a public hearing last November. Therefore, Council can consider <br />introduction of the proposed ordinance, but it should be referred back to the Planning <br />Commission for a public hearing prior to final adoption. <br /> <br />Councihnember Hendriksen stated that he was surprised to see the ordinance on the agenda <br />because his recollection was that this idea was a concept and when presented to the Council <br />sparked a lot of debate. He thought they were going to have answers to their questions. He <br />inquired as to how the policy would be implemented, what would be the mechanism, would it be <br />subject to the "whiplash effect", and would it be incorporated into the zoning chapter and require <br />a super majority vote to make any changes. <br /> <br />City Council/February 13, 2001 <br /> Page 20 of 28 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.