My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 02/27/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2001
>
Minutes - Council - 02/27/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:19:51 PM
Creation date
5/14/2003 3:20:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/27/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Anderson questioned if the property has not already been rezoned. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated no. He explained that the sixty-day rule states that the Council <br />must either approve or deny a request. A motion which fails is not saying the action is denied. <br />Mr. Goodrich inquired if the Council had any interest in extending the decision for 30 days. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson inquired if there was anything that ACCAP was proposing to do in <br />that 30 days. <br /> <br />Dale Jensen, Attorney representing ACCAP, replied that he was not sure as to what would be <br />accomplished in the 30 days. The hope was that there would be additional discussions between <br />the City and ACCAP. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Anderson to table action for 30 days at the request of ACCAP. <br /> <br />Motion failed for lack of a second. <br /> <br />C ouncilmember Hendriksen inquired if the Findings of Facts support approval or denial. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that the Findings of Fact were drafted to support denial. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman inquired as to which was stronger, the legislature four fifth vote <br />requirement to rezone property or the sixty day rule. He stated that it appears as if the sixty day <br />rule is a way to rezone property. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that generally the applicant is happy when the Council goes <br />beyond the 60 days, because then the action is approved. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmennan stated that in a sense then three out of the five of the <br />Councilmembers can dete~znine zoning rather than the customary four out of five. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich explained that the City has an extension through the evening to make a <br />decision and ACCAP is offering an additional 30 days. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired as to what would happen if the Council failed to take action <br />during the meeting. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that the action would be approved tomorrow. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that a legislature has required that a four-fifths vote is needed <br />for a rezoning, but they are required to deny it also so those who refuse to deny it can circumvent <br />the intention of State Statute by forcing the approval by forcing the default. <br /> <br />City Council/February 27, 2001 <br /> Page 13 of 23 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.