Laserfiche WebLink
th <br />as a cut through rather than using 179. She stated that there are quite a few children in the <br />neighborhood that bike and play in the street that she would be concerned about. She stated that <br />an event could generate 100 vehicles every weekend or every other weekend and she would be <br />concerned with that. She stated that she opposes the request because of the alcohol use and traffic <br />that would be generated. <br /> <br />th <br />Zach Bray, 5410 177 Lane NW, stated that he and his wife recently had a baby and would be <br />concerned with the noise. He stated that the property does not have a storm shelter and asked <br />where people would go if a storm came. <br /> <br />th <br />Dayette OBrien, 5400 177 Lane NW, stated that she submitted an email with 15 key points of <br />concern. She stated that this property is zoned residential and a wedding with alcohol would be <br />the same as a bar. She commented that people do not want to live next to a bar. She stated that <br />they did not move to this location to live next to a bar. <br /> <br />Kevin Dowell, 17937 Germanium, stated that he believes that this is not just impactful for the <br />neighbors but also adjacent properties because of the noise. He stated that this would be an outdoor <br />th <br />venue and the sound would carry. He stated that he is also concerned with traffic on 179 and the <br />pedestrian traffic as there are no sidewalks. He stated that even though this would be small, <br />businesses grow, and the problems would grow as well. <br /> <br />Ms. Massmann appreciated the comments of the neighbors. She stated that she does not want to <br />cause problems. She stated that she would love to use the property and open it for use for outside <br />events. She noted that with COVID people would prefer to have outdoor events. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bauer stated that the business plan shows a few events in the first few years and then <br />additional events in the future. He asked if there would be a limit of events based on the business <br />plan or whether the larger number of events could occur at any time. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that as written there would not be a restriction matching the <br />business plan. She stated that the CUP could be drafted in a way that would place a restriction on <br />the number of events per year. She reviewed some of the draft conditions that would be suggested <br />for a CUP of this nature. <br /> <br />Tammy Ruttger, 17944 Germanium Street, stated that her main concerns are related to overflow <br />parking that could park on her street in front of her home. She stated that she is also concerned <br />with what would occur in the case of a fire as there are no hydrants in the area. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Woestehoff, to close the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />A roll call vote was performed: <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson aye <br />Commissioner Johnson aye <br />Commissioner Woestehoff aye <br /> <br />Planning Commission/ September 3, 2020 <br />Page 8 of 15 <br /> <br />