My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 05/24/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2005
>
Agenda - Economic Development Authority - 05/24/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2025 1:32:42 PM
Creation date
5/20/2005 11:16:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
05/24/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memorandum <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Date: <br /> <br />Regarding: <br /> <br />Ramsey Economic Development Authority (EDA) <br /> <br />Jilll Gromberg, Ramsey EDA Member <br /> <br />May 5, 2005 <br /> <br />Proposed Lease Revenue Bond Issuance <br /> <br />While I am unavailable to attend the May EDA meeting due to a prior commitment, I feel <br />that il is important to reiterate my opposition to the issuance of the lease revenue bonds by <br />the I,;DA fin' the new municipal center. My opposition is based upon the proposed funding <br />meclnmism for the new municipal center and should not be construed as opposition to the <br />proposed facility. The reasoning for the use of the proposed funding mechanism, as stated <br />by tl~e City Council and Staff, is to avoid the possibility of a referendum by the voters on the <br />project. Below, I bare described some issues that could be resolved by the City using the <br />Capital hnprovement Plan Bonds (CIP Bonds) for the project. While CIP Bonds have the <br />possibility of a reverse referendum, this has not happened in the state since the creation of <br />this fumling source. <br /> The use of lease revenue bonds requires the EDA to create a redevelopment <br /> area that includes the site of the proposed facility and stipulates that this <br /> project will prevent the creation of blighted properties within that area. I <br /> find it hard to rationalize that the currently existing "vacant field" needs <br /> redevelopment or has any possibility of blighted conditions occurring as it <br /> is protected under the City's Town Center Zoning District ordinance and <br /> the master plan for the Ramsey Town Center. <br /> <br />The second and even more disturbing issue is that this course of action will <br />cost the taxpayers of the City more then $600,000 over other available <br />funding sources. Since none of the EDA members are willing to write an <br />annual check for $30,000, this amount is a significant expense to the EDA <br />and City. Staff has made the comment that the $600,000 is based upon the <br />full life of the bonds and that the City would probably refinance the debt at <br />some future point at a lower interest rate. As an EDA, we would be naive <br />to expect that the historically low interest rates currently being experienced <br />would go lower. <br /> <br />The EI)A exists to provide for the development of the City of Ramsey and continued growth <br />,f thc tax base, employment opportunities, and the economic well being of the community. <br />As a member of the EDA and taxpayer in Ramsey, I would be hard pressed to rationalize <br />how this added cost benefits businesses or the residents of the community. When we add <br />the ethical issue of classifying vacant land as a redevelopment area for the prevention of <br />blighh the EDA shouhl refrain from issuing the lease revenue bonds. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.