My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 09/03/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2020
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 09/03/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 10:44:03 AM
Creation date
10/15/2020 3:17:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/03/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Gengler aye <br /> Commissioner Woestehoff aye <br /> Commissioner Johnson aye <br /> Commissioner Anderson aye <br /> Commissioner VanScoy aye <br /> Chairperson Bauer aye <br /> Motion Carried. <br /> 7. COMMISSION BUSINESS <br /> . . <br /> 7.02: Review Revised Sketch Plan for Hunt Addition, Case of Platinum Land (Project 20- <br /> 105) <br /> Presentation <br /> Senior Planner McGuire Brigl presented the Staff Report stating that staff recommends directing <br /> the applicant to develop a preliminary plat incorporating staff comments and working with the <br /> adjacent neighbor to allow the neighboring property to develop in the future, per the property <br /> owner's request. <br /> Commission Business <br /> Councilmember Musgrove stated that she has concerns with Lot 14. She commented that the <br /> easement would be close to where a home would sit, and the property owner would assume they <br /> own more land than they do. She noted that she also has a concern with Lot 25. She stated that <br /> homeowners do not always understand how an easement works. <br /> Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that staff is also concerned with Lots 14, 25, 49, 55 and 56. <br /> She stated that there are other properties in the city that have similar easements that have caused <br /> confusion and multiple calls to City staff She stated that she would prefer to see 80 feet of <br /> buildable area for lots without the easement. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove commented that she believes that the lots would be more saleable in <br /> that manner and would create a better product that would benefit the developer in the end. <br /> Chairperson Bauer commended the developer for working with the City and the intent to not <br /> rezone the property. He believed that with these modifications the developer could come back <br /> with a sketch that would address these issues and continue this moving forward. <br /> Jason Bebeau, applicant, referenced the lots that were mentioned by Councilmember Musgrove <br /> and staff and commented that when people are purchasing lots in a development, every single lot <br /> is 80 feet wide and they are aware of what they are purchasing. He asked why they would want to <br /> lose additional lots when every lot is 80 feet wide and noted that all four corners of the lot are <br /> PlanningCommission/September 3 2020 <br /> P <br /> Page 11 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.