My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 09/03/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2020
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 09/03/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 10:44:03 AM
Creation date
10/15/2020 3:17:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/03/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Gengler aye <br /> Commissioner Peters aye <br /> Commissioner VanScoy aye <br /> Chairperson Bauer aye <br /> Motion Carried. <br /> Chairperson Bauer closed the public hearing closed at 8:00 p.m. <br /> Commission Business <br /> Commissioner Johnson stated that he loves the idea of having a wedding event venue with a barn <br /> in Ramsey but did not believe this was the right location because of the close proximity to <br /> neighbors, traffic, threats of fire, and that alcohol would be served in a residential area. <br /> Commissioner Woestehoff asked staff for clarification on the suggestion of an Interim Use Permit <br /> rather than a Conditional Use Permit, specifically whether the intent was for the permit to be time <br /> based rather than location based. <br /> Senior Planner McGuire Brigl confirmed that the intent of that suggestion would be to have the <br /> permit be time based. She stated that all of these approvals are reviewed by a development <br /> committee that include all City departments, including public safety. She stated that if the use <br /> were approved, public safety would work with the property to ensure that the building would be <br /> safe in terms of fire protection. She stated that all building permits and property reviews are funded <br /> by the applicant and not the taxpayers. <br /> Commissioner Woestehoff stated that he would be in favor of the ordinance but not this CUP. He <br /> asked that the actions be considered separately. <br /> Chairperson Bauer stated that the Commission could make a recommendation on the ordinance <br /> amendment without making the same recommendation on the CUP. <br /> Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that if something is listed as a conditional use in the zoning <br /> code, an applicant would receive the permit if the applicable conditions were met. She stated that <br /> a denial would not be appropriate if the applicant meets the requirements of the ordinance and <br /> findings of fact in the Conditional Use Permit. She stated that if the Commission is open to <br /> amending the zoning code, she would recommend that staff review the language again and also <br /> work with the applicant to further amend the CUP from the applicant as well. <br /> Chairperson Bauer stated that there were comments on two intersections and asked if public safety <br /> has commented on those intersections. <br /> Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that she had not heard those concerns prior to this week and <br /> would be willing to speak with public safety. <br /> Planning Commission/September 3, 2020 <br /> Page 9 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.