Laserfiche WebLink
S. 3021-5 <br />Subtitle A —General Provisions <br />SEC. 1101. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING WATER RESOURCES <br />DEVELOPMENT BILLS. <br />It is the sense of Congress that, because the missions of the <br />Corps of Engineers for navigation, flood control, beach erosion con- <br />trol and shoreline protection, hydroelectric power, recreation, water <br />supply, environmental protection, restoration, and enhancement, <br />and fish and wildlife mitigation benefit all Americans, and because <br />water resources development projects are critical to maintaining <br />the country's economic prosperity, national security, and environ- <br />mental protection, Congress should consider a water resources <br />development bill not less often than once every Congress. <br />SEC. 1102. STUDY OF THE FUTURE OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY <br />CORPS OF ENGINEERS. <br />(a) IN GENERAL. —The Secretary shall enter into an agreement <br />with the National Academy of Sciences to convene a committee <br />of experts to carry out a comprehensive study on— <br />(1) the ability of the Corps of Engineers to carry out its <br />statutory missions and responsibilities, and the potential effects <br />of transferring the functions (including regulatory obligations), <br />personnel, assets, and civilian staff responsibilities of the Sec- <br />retary relating to civil works from the Department of Defense <br />to a new or existing agency or subagency of the Federal Govern- <br />ment, including how such a transfer might affect the Federal <br />Government's ability to meet the current statutory missions <br />and responsibilities of the Corps of Engineers; and <br />(2) improving the Corps of Engineers' project delivery proc- <br />esses, including recommendations for such improvements, <br />taking into account factors including — <br />(A) the effect of the annual appropriations process <br />on the ability of the Corps of Engineers to efficiently secure <br />and carry out contracts for water resources development <br />projects and perform regulatory obligations; <br />(B) the effect that the current Corps of Engineers <br />leadership and geographic structure at the division and <br />district levels has on its ability to carry out its missions <br />in a cost-effective manner; and <br />(C) the effect of the frequency of rotations of senior <br />leaders of the Corps of Engineers and how such frequency <br />affects the function of the district. <br />(b) CONSIDERATIONS. —The study carried out under subsection <br />(a) shall include consideration of— <br />(1) effects on the national security of the United States; <br />(2) the ability of the Corps of Engineers to maintain suffi- <br />cient engineering capability and capacity to assist ongoing and <br />future operations of the United States armed services; <br />(3) emergency and natural disaster response obligations <br />of the Federal Government that are carried out by the Corps <br />of Engineers; and <br />(Al +ho X/ of +h a (Inv, of P71rrinoorc fn ;1^1n1NEI7C. off;_ <br />