My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 09/22/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2020
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 09/22/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 11:25:08 AM
Creation date
10/21/2020 8:59:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
09/22/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Musgrove stated that she would like to eliminate a portion of the last statement, <br />as she does not believe it is accurate. She believed the sentence should end at “benefiting <br />properties”. <br /> <br />Finance Director Lund explained the reason the statement was included. <br /> <br />Members of the Council and staff provided alternate suggestions for the language of that sentence. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich explained the intent of the statement, noting that there are multiple ways <br />to convey that. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that she prefers less language to provide a more concise and less <br />convoluted statement. <br /> <br />Mayor LeTourneau stated that the statement addresses the concern with the potential of double <br />taxing. He stated that the intent would be to explain that this would replace one funding source <br />with another. <br /> <br />Finance Director Lund explained that special assessments only covered 25 percent of the cost of <br />road improvements, therefore if the remainder of the sentence is removed, that does not explain <br />the other 75 percent of the funding that was used for that funding method. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley suggested adding the word anticipated, that this “is anticipated to <br />eliminate”. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove agreed that would be more truthful. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley suggested having different letters for business and residential customers. <br /> <br />Finance Director Lund asked if the Council would like to have the letter included with the utility <br />billing or as a separate letter. She commented that some customers receive billing electronically <br />and therefore staff would not be able to differentiate between the customer type. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley commented that he would like to see the information specific to the type of <br />customer to make the information more applicable and clearer. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that she has received questions from residents as to what <br />businesses will be paying and believed that all the information should be included in one letter. <br />She believed that people would be able to read and understand the portion that applies to them. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that he would support the separate letter method differentiating <br />between residential and commercial customers. <br /> <br />Finance Director Lund stated that she could move the residential portion to the top, which would <br />make it easier for that information to be found and differentiate between the two. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / September 22, 2020 <br />Page 2 of 9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.