My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 03/27/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2001
>
Minutes - Council - 03/27/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:21:35 PM
Creation date
5/14/2003 3:29:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/27/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'development to maintain the same character. A Charter Amendment was passed by the citizens <br />of Ramsey regarding the issue and his understanding was that the City Attorney advised that <br />Council that they should draft an ordinance reflecting the intent of the Charter Amendment. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that that was true. <br /> <br />Mr. Lichter stated that it was his understanding and belief that all the Councilmembers have <br />supported density transitioning in their campaign literature and requested that they keep their <br />promise or let the voters decide the issue. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired as to where the City currently stands if a developer were to <br />come into the City and want to develop a parcel of land. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that currently there is not a density transition ordinance in place <br />or enforcing Charter Amendment. Currently there are things that staff has done in regards to <br />buffering that they could continue to do. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that a developer who wanted to max his profit could say they <br />did not want to follow those suggestions made by staff. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that if the development complies with development standards <br />then they would not be obligated. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired as where they stand in regards to the density transition <br />ordinance introduced in December. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that it is still available for adoption. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if it was true that when the citizens pass something the <br />Council has fewer options in changing those standards in the future. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich and Mr. Thomson agreed with Councilmember Hendriksen's statement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if for example the City of Richfield is taken to court and <br />court determines that the issue Mr. Thomson brought up did not upstand to the level of <br />manifestly unconstitutional and it was placed on the ballot would the same apply to their issue. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied yes that it would impact the legal opinion given to the Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired if it was possible that the issue could be placed on the <br />ballot in Ramsey, based on what happens in Richfield. <br /> <br />City Council/March 27, 2001 <br /> Page 13 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.