My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 10/01/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2020
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 10/01/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 10:44:14 AM
Creation date
11/12/2020 12:36:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
10/01/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner VanScoy aye <br /> Chairperson Bauer aye <br /> Motion Carried. <br /> 5. CONSENT AGENDA <br /> 5.01: Approve the September 3, 2020 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Gengler, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to approve the consent <br /> agenda as presented. <br /> A roll call vote was performed: <br /> Commissioner Anderson aye <br /> Commissioner Gengler aye <br /> Commissioner Peters aye <br /> Commissioner Woestehoff aye <br /> Commissioner VanScoy aye <br /> Chairperson Bauer aye <br /> Motion Carried. <br /> 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS/COMMISSION BUSINESS <br /> 6.01: Public Hearing: Consider Request for Variance to Minimum Lot Size and Width at <br /> 4944 178th Lane NW (Project No. 20-129); Case of Jack and Sandra Kuhn <br /> Public Hearing <br /> Chairperson Bauer called the public hearing to order at 7:04 p.m. <br /> Presentation <br /> City Planner Anderson presented the staff report stating that staff recommends adopting <br /> Resolution #20-222 granting a variance to lot size and width for the subject property, which will <br /> allow an Administrative Subdivision to be completed to correct multiple existing structure <br /> encroachments. <br /> Chairperson Bauer asked and received confirmation that if approved,the accessory structure would <br /> be within its property and all properties would meet the required setbacks. He stated that the <br /> variance would be for lot size, because of the changing lot size for the one lot. He asked if the <br /> other lots involved would require variances. <br /> Planning Commission/October 1, 2020 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.