My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 06/09/2005 - Joint with CC
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2005
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 06/09/2005 - Joint with CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2025 3:09:04 PM
Creation date
6/7/2005 8:12:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Title
Joint with CC
Document Date
06/09/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Willow Control <br /> <br />WJlloxvs may become a problem <br />If xvillow's are groxving in proxknity to a trail, an aggressive mowing program should be established <br />where they are mowed frequently within no less than 20 feet of the trails surface. An absolute minimum <br />,,f 15' feet of separation should be maintained xvith herbicide, betxveen any evidence of willoxv shoots <br />and the trail surface. <br /> <br />\',Tillows are identified in an area proposed for a trail <br />la this case, the most cost effective strategy may be to mechanical remove the alluvial soils (with roots) <br />t~o a depth of up to 36 inches by a significant width. This is often possible at large construction sites - <br />with sand hauled back in place. If there is likelihood that viable willow roots remain, Biobarrier should <br />bc installed at the time of trail construction. If there is loxv probability, black plastic may be a more <br />economical solution. <br /> <br />Case History of Effective Control <br /> <br />'['here does not appear to be a great deal of history on the effectiveness of Biobarrier root control use <br />(or other documented strategies) in association with bituminous trails. The City of Ramsey has however <br />conducted several test areas to determine local effectiveness. <br /> <br />Cottonwood Park (year 2000) <br />This zone includes Biobarrier #1 installed as a 36" curtain on either side of the blacktop trail east of the <br />bridge. Adjoining segments are also trenched, but instead of Biobarrier, they are backfflled with pea <br />gravel. <br /> <br />Savanna Trail (year 2002) <br />This 160 feet of trail has 19 ½" of Biobamer #2 installed as a vertical curtain on both sides of the trail. <br />'l 'he other difference from the above installation is that 2,OD was used to 'kill' the Sandbar Willows prior <br />t~o replacement of the bituminous surface instead of Glycol Phosphate [Round-up]. <br /> <br />Lake Itasca Trail (year 2003) <br />~l'his site's willow control examination is likely to yield the most conclusive info~mafion. The test area <br />consists of 180 feet of xvillow impacted trail divided into three sections. The first 60' foot portion (figure <br />l.) xvill be the same Biobarrier #2 product applied horizontally under the trail's surface, after the removal <br />~f the blacktop and Class - 5. lit should be noted that both the manufacture and the vendor of this <br />product recommend its use vertically as installed above, Apparendy, Biobarrier is intended to inhibit the <br />growth of root tips; horizontal installation presumably could allow roots to grow parallel under the <br />material, and as they become larger in diameter, 'lift' the trailversus breaching the surface which is the usual <br />problem]. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.