My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 10/08/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2020
>
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 10/08/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 11:59:11 AM
Creation date
12/1/2020 9:42:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
10/08/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Bennett commented that it appears that everyone seems supportive of at least looking into <br />the cost. <br /> <br />Commissioner Leistico stated that she gives higher priority to things that citizens have invested <br />their own time in and bring forward, especially when they are realistic in terms of cost. <br /> <br />Chair Bennett stated that it would appear the next step would be to direct staff to continue to move <br />forward and determine the most efficient and effective manner to expand the dog park and possibly <br />add lighting. <br /> <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated that staff will look into the <br />potential cost further and bring it back to the Commission at its November meeting. He stated that <br />he will also provide a more detailed map with gate locations and perimeter, noting that one triangle <br />area proposed to be included would be left out because of its use for sports. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sis asked if there would be interest to separate areas for small and large dogs. <br /> <br />that in her discussions with users she has not heard that request. <br /> <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated that he has asked users that <br />question as well and has not heard much support for that idea. He stated that some people come <br />with both small and larger dogs and like to have them together. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Sis, seconded by Commissioner Leistico, to explore the expansion of <br />the dog park including estimated costs. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chair Bennett; Commissioners Sis, Leistico, Barnes, Barten, Guck, <br />and Loss. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />5.02: Recommend 2021 Park Development Fees and Rates and Charges <br /> <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated that each year the Commission <br />makes a recommendation to the Council related to parks and trails fees. He stated that staff <br />recommends that there be no increase in the park dedication or trail fees for 2021. He noted that <br />modest increases were last made in 2018. <br /> <br />Chair Bennett commented that the rates are still competitive and sometimes even better than other <br />communities and would support keeping the rates steady. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Sis, seconded by Commissioner Loss, to recommend to City Council to <br />maintain Park Dedication and Trail Fees at the existing rates, for 2021, to include the residential <br />per unit fees and including the per acre rates for the commercial/industrial subdivision of land. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chair Bennett; Commissioners Sis, Loss, Barnes, Barten, Guck, and <br />Leistico. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/October 8, 2020 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.