My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/05/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2020
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/05/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:06:29 AM
Creation date
12/2/2020 12:44:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
11/05/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner VanScoy aye <br />Chairperson Bauer aye <br />Motion Carried. <br />5. CONSENT AGENDA <br />5.01: Approve the September 3, 2020 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. <br />Motion by Commissioner Gengler, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to approve the consent <br />agenda as presented. <br />A roll call vote was performed: <br />Commissioner Anderson aye <br />Commissioner Gengler aye <br />Commissioner Peters aye <br />Commissioner Woestehoff aye <br />Commissioner VanScoy aye <br />Chairperson Bauer aye <br />Motion Carried. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS/COMMISSION BUSINESS <br />6.01: Public Hearing: Consider Request for Variance to Minimum Lot Size and Width at <br />4944 178th Lane NW (Project No. 20-129); Case of Jack and Sandra Kuhn <br />Public Hearing <br />Chairperson Bauer called the public hearing to order at 7:04 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />City Planner Anderson presented the staff report stating that staff recommends adopting <br />Resolution #20-222 granting a variance to lot size and width for the subject property, which will <br />allow an Administrative Subdivision to be completed to correct multiple existing structure <br />encroachments. <br />Chairperson Bauer asked and received confirmation that if approved, the accessory structure would <br />be within its property and all properties would meet the required setbacks. He stated that the <br />variance would be for lot size, because of the changing lot size for the one lot. He asked if the <br />other lots involved would require variances. <br />Planning Commission/ October 1, 2020 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.