My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/03/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2020
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 12/03/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:06:39 AM
Creation date
12/2/2020 12:51:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
12/03/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
numerous conversations with the DNR Floodplain Manager and the fact that this is before the <br />Commission shows that there is a path to approval, if desired. He stated that the watershed was <br />not consulted because the disturbance is under the one-acre threshold. He noted that the City, <br />DNR and FEMA have been involved in the review of this request. <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson asked if the necessary approvals were gained from the City for the <br />retaining wall construction. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl replied that there were no approvals for the retaining wall. She <br />stated that a contractor did reach out last year and staff noted the necessary regulations and that a <br />wall over four feet requires a permit. She stated that originally the wall was measured at four feet <br />tall, but one layer of brick has since been removed to come under that height. She stated that the <br />DNR has helped staff find a path to approval but does not provide recommendations. She <br />explained that the DNR is available as a tool and resource but does not make a recommendation <br />or approval. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bauer asked the options that would be available if this were approved and the <br />calculations come back above zero percent rise. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl replied that staff is hopefully that the results will show a 0.0 percent <br />rise, but if rise is created the applicant could completed remediation of the rise elsewhere to <br />mitigate that rise. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bauer stated that this intrudes on a portion of the conservation and trail easement and <br />asked what would need to be reimbursed. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl replied that the City on occasion vacates drainage and utility <br />easements but does not typically vacate conservation easements. She estimated that the cost would <br />be about $1,000 and staff would recommend that the homeowner pay that amount. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that staff indicated that the applicant did not obtain a building <br />permit for the wall and indicated that a contractor contacted the City in advance. He asked if the <br />applicant was aware that they were building a retaining wall in a conservation easement and <br />floodplain and still proceeded. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl suggested that the applicant answer that question. <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson stated that perhaps neighboring property owners would want to construct <br />retaining walls and asked if those property owners would also need to obtain CUPs. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl confirmed that a CUP would be required along with vacation of the <br />conservation and trail easement. She stated that the easement varies from site to site and some <br />property owners have more usable backyard space outside of the easement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove referenced the letter sent to the residents and asked if the Commission <br />has a copy of that letter. She felt that the information in the letter could be helpful to clarify some <br /> <br />Planning Commission/ November 5, 2020 <br />Page 9 of 19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.