Laserfiche WebLink
7. COMMISSION BUSINESS <br />7.01: Review Concept Plan for Rivenwick 4th Addition; Case of Lennar for Rivenwick 4th <br />Concept Plan (Project 20-134) <br />Presentation <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl presented the Staff Report stating that staff recommends retaining <br />the existing PUD as is. This guides land along Highway 10 for retail/commercial and leaves viable <br />commercial pads with visibility on Highway 10. <br />Commission Business <br />Chairperson Bauer stated that he would follow the guidance of the EDA, noting that most retailers <br />want Highway 10 visibility. He stated that he would prefer to leave the area as retail. <br />Commissioner Peters agreed that would be too much residential next to the highway and the retail <br />portion should remain. <br />Commissioner VanScoy concurred. <br />Commissioner Anderson stated that when this parcel has come up in the past, the Commission <br />worked hard to determine the land use and found that commercial use along the highway was the <br />best use of the space and he still agrees with that. <br />Commissioner Woestehoff agreed, stating that there has already been a compromise for this parcel <br />to meet the current PUD and would not want to amend it further. <br />Commissioner Gengler agreed. <br />Sections 7.02 — 8 Intentionally Deleted <br />9. ADJOURNMENT <br />Motion by Commissioner Peters, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to adjourn the meeting. <br />A roll call vote was performed: <br />Commissioner Anderson aye <br />Commissioner Peters aye <br />Commissioner Gengler aye <br />Commissioner Woestehoff aye <br />Commissioner VanScoy aye <br />Chairperson Bauer aye <br />Planning Commission/ November 5, 2020 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />