Laserfiche WebLink
CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 11/24/2020 <br />Submitted For: Len Linton, Engineering/Public Works <br />By: Len Linton, Engineering/Public Works <br />5.4. <br />Information <br />Title <br />Award Contract for Review and Monitoring of Wetland Mitigation Areas in the COR <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The COR, formerly Ramsey Town Center, is a master planned development that was started in the early 2000's. <br />The site contained several wetlands that were filled to provide more developable space. The plans for the project <br />included creating several wetland mitigation areas to off set the loss of wetlands in other parts of the COR. The <br />wetland mitigation process requires monitoring and vegetation management of the mitigated areas for five (5) <br />years, with submittal of a monitoring report each year. The wetlands are reviewed by a Technical Evaluation Panel <br />at the end of the 5 years to verify the mitigation is functioning as intended. <br />The mitigation areas, which are between East Ramsey Parkway North and East Ramsey Parkway South at Peridot <br />Street and at the northeast corner of Bunker Lake Boulevard and Armstrong Boulevard, were created when the site <br />was mass graded in the mid 2000's. The City went out for proposals for the monitoring in 2009. Monitoring and <br />reporting was conducted for 2 years. The selected consultant had staff changes, losing the expertise to provide this <br />service. The City also had staff changes during this time and the need for completing the reporting was forgotten. <br />The Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization (LRRWMO), which ultimately approves the <br />completed mitigation project, reminded the City in 2020 that the reporting needs to be completed. <br />Staff identified six (6) consultants that provide this service and requested proposals for completing the reporting <br />and vegetation management for the mitigated wetlands. Staff received three (3) responses, one was shortly after the <br />proposal was sent out, indicating their workload did not permit preparation of a proposal at this time. Staff received <br />two (2) proposals which were evaluated. Responses were not received from the other three (3) consultants. <br />The received proposals were evaluated on Project Team. Experience, Work Plan and Cost. Three staff reviewed the <br />proposals and all three judged one proposal to be the best. <br />The City needs to complete the monitoring and reporting on the mitigated wetlands, otherwise the LRRWMO could <br />require creation of new wetland mitigation areas to replace the current areas that were not completed. <br />The request for proposals, the two received proposals and the scoring sheet are attached to this case. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The proposals were received from Houston Engineering and SEH, Inc. Both firms have experience in this type of <br />work. The proposal from SEH, Inc. was determined to provide the best value to the City based on the project team, <br />experience and work plan. Their proposal was also the lowest cost. Houston Engineering proposed completing the <br />work for $22,500, while SEH, Inc. came in at $10,500. The proposals state they are hourly with a maximum not to <br />exceed amount and the executed contract contain this requirement. <br />Obtaining approval of the mitigated wetlands will require submittal of the monitoring report to the Lower Rum <br />River Watershed Management Organization. They will review the report then convene a Technical Evaluation <br />Panel (TEP) on site to compare the report with the vegetation onsite. The TEP will issue a recommendation to <br />accept the mitigated wetland or identify areas that must be corrected so the mitigation areas can be accepted. <br />