Laserfiche WebLink
Terrance Petro <br />6140 157m lane NW <br />Ramsey, Minnesota 55303 <br />(763) 427-6833 <br /> <br />May 21, 2005 <br /> <br />Tom Gamec <br />Mayor, City of Ramsey <br />15153 Nowthen Boulevard NW <br />Ramsey, Mn 55303 <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec, <br /> <br />I am writing to express my concerns about a new housing development under consideration in Ramsey. <br />The development specifically is the Shade Tree Community proposed between County Road 5 and <br />Potassium, and south of 157 Lane NW. I have lived at my present location for 26 years now, on 1.38 acres <br />of land, with my immediate neighbors.to the East also living on at least 1~ acre lots. The property to our <br />south has been zoned RI Single Family for this entire time. I am not totally naive about development in <br />Ramsey. [ always expected this property to be developed, but my expectations were that someone would <br />put single family homes on reasonable sized lots as the zoning calls for. I did not expect that a town home <br />devetopment would ever be considered for this property. <br /> <br />My concerns are as follows: <br /> <br />Transitioning from 1 acre+ home sites to PUD - The preliminary site plan calls for seventeen "detached <br />townhouse" units to be built adjacent to my neighbors and my own home. Average lot size for these units <br />would be approximately 3500 square feet. This is next to existing homesites that are between 42,000 and <br />60,000 square feet in lot size. Putting a road against our property lines with a retaining wall and a row of <br />immature trees is not an acceptable transition. When John Peterson developed the property to our east, the <br />transition was to '/2 acre lots with single family homes. I expect the same considerations for this <br />development. <br /> <br />City Streets on front and back of existing homes - It is not acceptable to put a road along the south <br />property lines of the existing homes on 157th Lane NW. It is common knowledge that adding this road <br />would lower the property values of the existing properties. I do not see any effort to discuss this with the <br />existing property owners and compensate them for their loss. My information states that this road could <br />amount to a 3-7% decrease in property values. This could amount to as much as $15,000 per home on <br />those houses(based on approximate values of $250k per home). I would expect that the Greenberg <br />residence could be much more as they will have busy streets on three sides of their property which is totally <br />unacceptable. .. <br /> <br />Cul-De-Sac Exceeds City Code and is too Narrow - The plan for 157th Ave. is to exceed the maximum <br />length allowed and to make it four feet narrower than recommended. With the excessively high <br />concentration of homes on this street, and very short driveways for these townhomes, there will be <br />significant parking on the streets. Even if parking was allowed on only one side of the street, access for fire <br />and emergency will be very limited, with no way for a large fire truck to mm around. If there is a fire in <br />one of these homes, is the plan to access them with fire trucks across my property? <br /> <br />Increased Traffic Flow - With all of the housing units in this site plan, the increase of traffic will be huge. <br />157'h Lane has already turned in to a through street between Cty 5 and Hwy 47 since the development to <br />the East was added (there was a gate promised to pr4vent this, but this was deleted without notice to the <br />existing residents). I don't see an adequate plan to handle traffic out of either the north or the south. There <br />was discussion on upgrading and realignment,of Old County 5, but il~is:unknown as to who oWns this road. <br />This shou d be resolved,betbre site plan approval. ' ' <br /> <br /> <br />