Laserfiche WebLink
iVrtrrower lot widths for urban single-family lots. Current regulations require urban single- <br />family lots to be at least 80 feet wide at the front-yard setback line. The proposed <br />development shows lot widths for the detached townhomes at 43 feet. <br />Reduced building setbacks. City Code establishes a 30 foot front yard setback. The <br />development is proposing front yard setbacks that range from 10 to 50 feet for the single <br />thmily lots and 25 feet for the detached townhouse units. The reduced setback is to <br />accommodate the location of homes around the wetlands. <br />Reduced private street width. The development contains one private street that is 28 feet in <br />width. City Code states that streets exceeding 300 feet in length must be 32 feet in width. The <br />reason the applicant is requesting a reduced private street width is to allow for additional <br />green area/landscaping between the proposed development and the existing single family <br />residential development located immediately north. <br />Puhlic Street exceeding length requirement: The preliminary plat is showing a public street <br />that exceeds 600 feet in length. Due to the location of wetlands on the property, the public <br />street is unable to be connected to another public street and the additional length is needed in <br />order to access the high ground for the proposed single family homes. <br /> <br />The PUD ordinance requires that the development have either 20% public open space or 50% <br />private and open space. The development shows 50.2 % private open space. The preliminary plat <br />is providing a "no mow" zone around the wetlands in order to protect the wetlands from home <br />owners who desire to manicure a portion of the wetland surrounding their lot. <br /> <br />'l'hc Planning Commission held the public hearing and reviewed the rezoning request at their <br />April 7, 2005 meeting. Subsequent to the meeting, staff came across a section in City Code that <br />requires developments proposing townhouses within the R-1 District to be reviewed under the R- <br />2 standards when processed through a PUD. In lieu of this information, the above information <br />has bccn modified accordingly: <br /> <br />Sm~_te Family Lots <br />Minimum lot size 8,800sf <br /> <br />Townhomes <br /> <br />Lot 3, Block 4 will be 20.4 feet from the <br />exterior boundary line <br /> <br />Minimum 70 foot lot width Minimum 15 feet between structures <br /> <br />Minimum 12 foot front yard setback <br />fi-om the edge of the street right of <br />way (the houses will still have a 25 <br />foot driveway) <br />Lot 24 & 39 will have a 6 foot side <br />yard setback on both sides <br /> <br />Reco~nmendation: <br /> <br />Thc l~lanning Commission recommended that the City Council deny the rezoning on a 3:2 vote <br />and I member abstaining..The denial recommendation was basedon findings of fact, which are <br />attached to this case. In general the Planning Commission could' n'ot'support the rezoning for the <br />t'~)llowing reasons: <br /> <br /> <br />