Laserfiche WebLink
bmld,n setbacks, a narrower private street, and a pubhc street that exceeds 600 feet m~ <br /> length. <br /> <br />9. That the prehm~nau plat ~s proposing 50.2% private open space as p~ of the development, <br /> 0 .... . <br /> which meets the 50 % reqmrement for private open space reqmred under C~ O:~dmaa~'es, <br /> <br />10. marketThat thevaluePrOposedof su~oundingdevel°pmentpropeaies.Will exercise substantial detrimental in <br />I I. That the proposed development wxll show a hvorable economm:!mpa~t <br /> at large. <br /> <br />12. That the proposed development will adversely impact as wetlands, <br /> water features, woodlands, and steep slopes. <br /> <br />13. That the proposed development will not protect and ualities to the greatest <br /> extent possible. <br /> <br />14. That the proposed development will impose unduei¢~/'den on public services and facilities, <br /> including fire and police protection, schools, str~a~;.~ate~:~ystems, sanitary sewer systems <br /> anti storm sewer systems. <br /> <br />15. That the proposed development is n6i~~ desired in3~:uch a way as to form a desirable and <br /> unified environment within its o~ boundarie~;-:~tld also will be detrimental to future land <br /> uses in the surrounding areas. <br /> <br />NOWTHEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED-THAT THE CITY COUNCIL FINDS THE <br />FOLLOWING DEVIATIONS FROM CITY CODE UNACCEPTABLE: <br /> <br />1. That the following deviations from City Ordinances are found acceptable as part of this PUD; <br /> smaller lot sizes, narrower-lOt 'Widths for the detached townhouses, reduced building <br /> setbacks, the combination ofsir!gleTamily and detached townhouse units, a narrower private <br /> street, and a public street that is 640 feet in length. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoptiOn.of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br /> __., and upon vote being taken thereon, the following, voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #05-xx-xxx <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />