Laserfiche WebLink
located in Chapter 9. She stated the majority of these regulations would remain unchanged, <br />hc)wcvcr, a ten foot setback is proposed from side and rear property lines. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler noted that finally, certain structures are exempted from the building <br />permit process such as accessory structures 120 square feet or less, fences six' feet or less in <br />height, swimming pools and spas less than 5,000 gallons, and driveways. She indicated that all <br />ot' these types of structures must still comply with zoning regulations. Thus, a zoning permit has <br />bccn crcatcd and would be required to help ensure that these types of structures are properly <br />locatcd on a property and meet all other zoning regulations. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked if there would be a fee with the zoning permit. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler indicated there would, and Staff is proposing $15.00. <br /> <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt called the public hearing to order at 9:15 p.m. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Van Scoy, to close the public hearing at <br />9:15 p.m. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Van Scoy, Brauer, Johnson, <br />Shepherd, and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Shepherd. <br /> <br />Commission Input <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson commented they may be inviting problems with a two-story accessory <br />structure built as an office becoming a living unit, just as they did in Kenwood. He stated over <br />ti~ne they are wired and plumbed and become off-line living areas as a natural evolution. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked how you could get a two-story structure with a maximum height <br />of 20-feet. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon indicated they look at average ground level to <br />avcragc gable level, which allows for a two-story structure in most cases. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked if they were saying that if someone has 40 acres or more there is <br />no limit to the maximum size of accessory structures, so if someone had a nursery they could put <br />al large grccnhouse up and it would not have to come to the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler indicated that would be considered a non-residential use. <br /> <br />('tin, missioner Van Scoy noted that saying unlimited scares him. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/April 21, 2005 <br /> Page 18 of 23 <br /> <br /> <br />