My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/14/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 06/14/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 1:51:00 PM
Creation date
6/10/2005 2:31:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/14/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
571
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a. Describe sources, composition and quantities of all sanitary, municipal and industrial <br /> wastewater produced or treated at the site. <br /> Extension of the sewer main is required for this project. Sanitary sewer will be installed with the internal streets to <br /> provide service to thc development. The source ofwastewater from this project will be 253 single family homes. <br /> The composition of the waste is typical residential wastewater. An estimate of the amount of wastewater produced <br /> is based on a volume of 100 gallons per capita per day, 253 single family homes, and an average of 2.75 people per <br /> home, which results in a volume of 69,575 gallons per day. No industrial wastewater will be produced at the site. <br /> <br />b. Describe waste treatment methods or pollution prevention efforts and give estimates <br /> of composition after treatment. Identify receiving waters, including major downstream <br /> water bodies, and estimate the discharge impact on the quality of receiving waters. If <br /> the project involves on-site sewage systems, discuss the suitability of site conditions <br /> for such systems. <br /> No wastewater treatment will be done on site. Currently, the City of Ramsey's sanitary wastewater is collected in <br /> interceptor sewers and treated by the Met Council's existing treatment facility in St. Paul, Sanitary wastewate~r fi.om <br /> this project will also be treated by the Met Council's existing Metro municipal sewage treatment facility. The'plant <br /> treats the wastewater to MPCA standards and discharges the treated effluent to the Mississippi River. <br /> <br />c. If wastes will be discharged into a publicly owned treatment facility, identify the facility, <br /> describe any pretreatment provisions and discuss the facility's ability to handle the <br /> volume and composition of wastes, identifying any improvements necessary. <br /> Wastcwater from this project will go to the existing Met Council IVletro treatment plant in St. Paul. The existing <br /> plant has adequate capacity to service the project, therefore no improvements will be necessary. <br /> <br />d. If the project requires disposal of liquid animal manure, describe disposal technique <br /> and location and discuss capacity to handle the volume and composition of manure. <br /> Identify any improvements necessary. Describe any required setbacks for land <br /> disposal systems. <br /> No animal wastes, except domestic pet waste, will be produced on site. <br /> <br />a. Describe any of the following geologic site hazards to ground water and als° identify <br /> them on the site map: sinkholes, shallow limestone formations or karst conditions. <br /> Describe measures to avoid or minimize environmental problems due to any of these <br /> hazards. <br /> Minim um depth (in feet) Average depth <br /> <br /> Groundwater 3 ft Groundwater 12.9 ft <br /> Bedrock 110 ft Bedrock 125 ft <br /> Groundwater information is for 9 of the 13 borings done by Braun Intertec. Most of the borings caved in after <br /> drilling, so depth to water is from the "while drilling" estimates. Groundwater was not encountered in 4 of the <br /> borings. There are no wells on the site, according to the County Well Index. Bedrock information is from the <br /> County Well Index tbr three wells nearby to the south of the site. The first bedrock encountered is the Franconia <br /> fo~wnation. There are no known siiqkholes, shallow limestone formatio~i~g or karst conditions at the site. <br /> <br />b. Describe the soils on the site, giving NRC'S (SCS) classifications, if known. Discuss <br /> soil granularity and potential for groundwater contamination from wastes or chemicals <br /> spread or spilled onto the soils. Discu'.ss any mitigation measures to prevent such <br /> contamination. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.