Laserfiche WebLink
Community Development Director Frolik replied that staff could take the same language from <br />Die Hard Paintball permit and include it in this permit~ <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson stated that she would prefer that the business be located in a different <br />location, but she does realize they need a place to go. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich noted that if the City were to identify a piece of property as its official <br />map and the owner would then choose to place a building on that property they will not be <br />compensated because they have been put on notice that it will possibly be used for a public <br />improvement project. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Zimmerman, seconded by Councilmember Kurak, to adopt the <br />resolution adopting findings of fact relating to a request from Kenko inc. for an interim use <br />permit for the utilization of a temporary office structure and outdoor storage. <br /> <br />Further discussion: City Attorney Goodrich stated that they should probably include a findings <br />of fact for granting the permit for three years. Mayor Gamec recommended a finding that would <br />only allow for the permit to be in place for three years because of the future planning and use of <br />the area. City Attorney Goodrich suggested that wording "...for potential development in three <br />years." Councilmember Hendriksen stated that finding #15 states that the use will be <br />harmonious and appropriate in appearance, but outside storage is not consistent with the Town <br />Center. Councilmember Anderson replied that they could remove finding #15. Councilmember <br />Hendriksen stated that the accurate statement would be that it will not be operated and <br />maintained so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance..." or if the.Council is intended <br />to grant the permit then it might be justification for granting a three year permit rather than a five <br />year permit. City Attorney Goodrich recommended adding the following language to the end of <br />finding #15 "...for no more than .three years." He also recommended that an additional finding <br />be added which would state "That future development of the adjacent property may make the use <br />inappropriate in the date hereof." Councilmember Hendriksen noted that finding gl 8 needed to <br />be amended to read "That during the three year term the proposed use will not be..." <br />Councilmember Anderson felt that finding #11 should include some wording to recognize that <br />the property is under a moratorium. Consensus of the,Council was to add to the end of finding # <br />11 the following "...and/or Armstrong Boulevard right of way, and future Town Center area. <br />City Attorney Goodrich recommended that finding gl 5 read "That during the three-year term the <br />proposed use will be operated and maintained." Councilmember Hendriksen replied that the City <br />is not permitting other businesses in the area to store equipment outside. City Attorney Goodrich <br />replied that those businesses have not applied. Councilmember Hendriksen noted that the City <br />has required brick facade, etc in the past on business in that area. Community Development <br />Director Frolik replied that that was before the property was placed in a moratorium. <br />Councilmember Anderson noted that the request is only for an interim use. Community <br />Development Director Frolik explained that the industrial zoning does allow for outside storage; <br />but on. paved surface and it has to be enclosed. Councilmember Hendriksen replied that what is <br />being proposed is not consistent with what has been done in the past. Councilmember Anderson <br />stated that it would be better to delete finding #15. Councilmember Hendriksen replied that he <br /> <br />City Council/November 27, 2001 <br /> Page 10 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />