My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 11/10/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2020
>
Minutes - Council - 11/10/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 11:26:34 AM
Creation date
1/27/2021 10:38:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/10/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />with. He suggested that the homeowners or HOA handle regular maintenance and pipe failure <br />would be handled by the City. <br /> <br />Councilmember Menth stated that he understands that there are lift stations throughout the City <br />and asked the typical size. <br /> <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer estimated that typically those pipes are eight inches. <br /> <br />Councilmember Menth commented that this system was built differently, with the homes having <br />pressure out to the street. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that the City did not want another lift station, and this <br />was the alternative proposed by the developer. He explained that the City did not want to own and <br />maintain another lift station. He stated that the City Engineer noted that the life expectancy of the <br />two-inch pipe should be at least 50 years, if properly maintained, similar to the roadway. <br /> <br />Councilmember Menth asked if the City asked for this rather than a lift station. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that the City stated that it did not want a lift station, <br />especially to serve this small number of homes, and it was up to the developer as to how to solve <br />for that. He reviewed some of the other options the developer could have utilized including <br />bringing additional fill into the site to use the gravity flow. He stated that staff accepted this <br />solution with the caveat for maintenance. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht asked if there are other developments in the City in which developments <br />would be responsible for pipe maintenance in this manner. <br /> <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer replied that he is not aware of such situation. He stated that <br />there are a few companies that have systems of this nature, but not to this degree. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that there is one occasion where this is seen, but that is <br />more about clustered septic systems. He noted that this is a private system connecting to the public <br />system. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley asked if these details are within the development agreement. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that the review comments were recorded in the <br />Resolution approving the Final Plat and the details were reviewed again in the preconstruction <br />meeting. He stated that staff feels the direction was clear. He stated that there are records of the <br />notations that appear to have been lost in translation. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Musgrove, seconded by Councilmember Riley, to Adopt Resolution <br />#20-265 Approving Sanitary Sewer and Rain Garden Maintenance Agreement for River Walk <br />Village and denying request for the City to agree to regular maintenance of the force main. <br /> <br />City Council / November 10, 2020 <br />Page 7 of 13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.