Laserfiche WebLink
Finance Director Lund explained that the park trust can only be used for capital improvements and <br />cannot be used for general fund obligations. <br /> <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood explained that the intent of those <br />funds is that they be used for new capital improvements. He noted that the capital maintenance <br />fund is used for maintenance of existing park elements. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht stated that if additional parks and/or features can be maintained. <br /> <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood confirmed that staff plans to ensure <br />that the pace does not exceed the ability to maintain. He noted that the increased tax base should <br />generate the funds needed to maintain and provide services to the increasing number of residents. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley referenced well construction and pumphouse five and asked if that still fits <br />within the scope of the City. <br /> <br />Finance Director Lund replied that $50,000 was shown in 2021 and the remainder in 2025. She <br />stated that the funds allocated in 2021 were designated for a study to determine if that is an <br />appropriate site. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby confirmed that planning aligns with the study. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked for details on the Riversbend shelter replacement. <br /> <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood confirmed that the roof was replaced <br />on the north shelter along with refurbishing the remainder of the shelter. He stated that the south <br />shelter was donated around 1989 or 1990 and looks similar to a hay shelter. He commented that <br />there is not a way to improve that shelter and therefore it has been recommended to replace that <br />shelter. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that she would like additional time to review and discuss this <br />topic. <br /> <br />Finance Director Lund reviewed the available time at which this could come back as a worksession <br />prior to the required public hearing. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kuzma commented that the items included in the CIP are shown for planning <br />purposes and this is a fluid document. He noted that each individual project would need to come <br />before the Council for consideration. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Council that this topic will come back to the Council worksession on <br />th <br />November 24 and will appear on the consent agenda at that regular meeting to call for a public <br />th <br />hearing on December 8. <br /> <br />3. TOPICS FOR FUTURE DISCUSSION <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / November 10, 2020 <br />Page 5 of 6 <br /> <br />