My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 12/08/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2020
>
Minutes - Council - 12/08/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 11:28:12 AM
Creation date
1/27/2021 11:09:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/08/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Krekelberg stated that there has been movement between the different generations. He stated <br />that he was unaware of the deferred assessment until the closing on the property. He stated that <br />with his mortgage he is aware of the payment and interest that is due each month. He asked for <br />this compromise. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht thanked the resident for providing input and believed that the family’s <br />proposal is a good compromise that both takes ownership for their responsibility. He stated that <br />he supports this compromise. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Specht, seconded by Councilmember Musgrove, to approve the request <br />of the Hamilton and Holasek families to reduce the interest charged on deferred assessments due <br />upon their recent sale of Tract A, RLS No. 119, 2020. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Mayor LeTourneau asked staff for input on precedent that could be set by <br />accepting this proposal, as the process follows State Statute and City process. City Administrator <br />Ulrich confirmed that this would set a precedent that deferred assessments can be negotiated. He <br />stated that the City still can negotiate this as a potential settlement, if desired. He noted that if the <br />Council would like to follow this process moving forward there should be information within City <br />policy as such. Councilmember Musgrove asked if it would help for the Council to add language <br />to the motion specifying that this was due to green acres and generational changes, which would <br />then make this a specific action and not set precedent. City Administrator Ulrich stated that the <br />more specific they can be about this situation, the more helpful. He stated that there are fewer <br />green acres parcels left in Ramsey, the additional rational could help to limit the scope of precedent <br />being set. Mayor LeTourneau stated that perhaps these comments are contained as part of the <br />record, so it is clear as to what informed this decision. He stated that part of the decision in this <br />case is the lack of documentation. City Administrator Ulrich confirmed that could be sufficient. <br />He stated that staff could work with the City Attorney to develop language and findings of fact, <br />depending upon the timeline of the Holasek/Hamilton family. He confirmed that the motion could <br />stand as is. Mayor LeTourneau asked if this could move forward with staff bringing back that <br />formal language for the Council to approve. City Administrator Ulrich confirmed that staff could <br />th <br />work with the City Attorney and bring that language back at the December 15 meeting. <br />Councilmember Riley appreciated the situation of the family and the family making a reasonable <br />offer. He stated that he would be inclined to support this negotiation rather than moving forward <br />with a formal resolution tonight. Councilmember Musgrove commented that staff should seek out <br />any other deferred assessments to ensure that this situation does not repeat itself. City <br />Administrator Ulrich reviewed the language of the motion as stated. He commented that additional <br />details would be helpful to make it specific to the offer made by the family. Councilmember Riley <br />suggested that this motion not be followed and instead the direction be provided to staff to continue <br />negotiation with the family with the same outcome. City Administrator Ulrich stated that he would <br />prefer to draft a formal settlement agreement that could come forward to the Council on December <br />th <br />15 for acceptance. Councilmember Specht asked if Council approval is needed for this activity, <br />or whether the Council could simply provide that direction to staff. City Administrator Ulrich <br />stated that this would be a deviation from the policy and therefore approval from the Council would <br />be needed, or authorization would need to be given to staff to complete the settlement as agreed. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that he disagrees with the other members of the Council and <br />believes that the Council should stay consistent with the policy in this matter noting that he does <br />City Council / December 8, 2020 <br />Page 12 of 17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.