Laserfiche WebLink
easement because conservation easements <br />are passive easements, not active ones. As a <br />result, cities will have to re-record the <br />easements every 40 years in order to <br />maintain them. This will result in a <br />significant administrative burden and <br />increase costs for local units of government <br />due to staff time, legal fees, and recording <br />fees. <br />Additionally, Minn. Stat. § 500.20, entitled <br />"Defeasible Estates," provides in subd. 2a <br />that private covenants, conditions, or <br />restrictions that affect the title or use of real <br />estate cease to be valid 30 years after the <br />date of the instrument creating them and <br />they may be disregarded. This provision <br />was initially enacted in 1988. <br />Minn. Stat. ch. 84C regarding conservation <br />easements was enacted in 1985, and Minn. <br />Stat. §§ 84.64-.65 regarding conservation <br />restrictions were originally enacted in 1974. <br />Because conservation easements and <br />conservation restrictions are not listed <br />among the restrictions that are not subject to <br />Minn. Stat. § 500.20, subd. 2a, it is possible <br />to conclude, by negative implication, that <br />subd. 2a does apply to the conservation <br />easements and conservation restrictions <br />created by earlier enacted statues. This <br />conclusion is inconsistent with the language <br />in Minn. Stat. § 84C.02(b) that "a <br />conservation easement is unlimited in <br />duration unless the instrument creating it <br />otherwise provides." <br />Response: The League of Minnesota <br />Cities supports legislation that excepts <br />holders of conservation easements from <br />re-recording the easements under the <br />Minnesota Marketable Title Act and that <br />clarifies that Minn. Stat. § 500.20, subd. <br />2a, does not apply to conservation <br />easements and restrictions. <br />17 <br />SD-7. Racial Equity in Minnesota <br />Issue: Since the earliest days of its history, <br />race and racial inequity issues have been <br />present in Minnesota. Land acquisition and <br />ownership, discriminatory covenants <br />restricting homeownership to white <br />Minnesotans, and patterns of systemic, <br />structural, and institutional racism have <br />brought the state to experience some of the <br />worst racial disparities in the country for <br />employment, housing, education, health, <br />criminal justice, and law enforcement. <br />Explicit and implicit bias toward people of <br />color are prevalent in public policies and <br />other rules governing Minnesota residents. <br />Racial equity is accomplished when race can <br />no longer be used to predict success, and we <br />have government and systems that work for <br />all. <br />The data is readily available from the U.S. <br />Census, the state demographer, and local <br />government. For example, Minnesota ranks <br />50th in the nation for median income <br />equality and 49th in homeownership <br />equality. The killing of George Floyd and <br />the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 <br />on communities of color have further <br />highlighted the critical need to overhaul our <br />laws, policies, and practices to address <br />systemic racism. <br />Racial demographics are continually <br />changing throughout the state. According to <br />the state demographer, 20 percent of <br />Minnesota's population are people of color. <br />All racial groups have recently increased in <br />the state, but between 2010 and 2018, <br />Minnesota has added five times as many <br />people of color as white residents. <br />While every city may be in a different place, <br />the need for racial equity and the need to <br />repair past racial harms touches all <br />communities, from the most racially diverse <br />cities to cities with very few or no people of <br />