Laserfiche WebLink
While all cities must enforce certain codes <br />such as the accessibility code and the <br />bleacher safety code enforcement of the <br />SBC remains a local option for cities outside <br />of the seven -county metropolitan area with <br />fewer than 2,500 people that did not adopt <br />the code before Jan. 1, 2008. Requiring <br />enforcement of the SBC by smaller cities in <br />Greater Minnesota is cost -prohibitive for <br />many cities, and would result in an unfunded <br />mandated. <br />While a single set of coordinated codes <br />helps provide consistency in code <br />administration and enforcement, <br />implementation of sustainable building <br />design, construction, and operation does not <br />readily integrate with the existing state <br />building and energy code system. As a <br />result, many cities are interested in adopting <br />an advanced energy building standard <br />beyond the base statewide commercial code <br />for the construction, reconstruction, and <br />alteration of public and private commercial <br />buildings. An advanced energy building <br />standard would allow municipalities to <br />require more energy efficient buildings, <br />reducing the energy burden for building <br />occupants and lowering overall greenhouse <br />gas emissions. <br />Response: A statewide -enforced building <br />code may have benefits, but requiring it <br />would result in an unfunded mandate. <br />Enforcing the State Building Code should <br />remain a local option for the <br />municipalities that have not already <br />adopted the Code, unless the state fully <br />funds the costs of enforcement and <br />inspection services necessary to enforce a <br />statewide building code. If the Legislature <br />requires all cities to enforce the State <br />Building Code, local governments must <br />have the option to hire or select a building <br />official of their choice and set the <br />appropriate level of service even if the <br />33 <br />state fully funds code enforcement <br />activities. <br />The state should collaborate with local <br />governments, construction industry <br />representatives, and other stakeholders to <br />review the building and energy codes and <br />consider modifications to encourage <br />sustainable building design, construction, <br />and operation. <br />Specifically: <br />a) For purposes of federal conformity, <br />the state should adopt the <br />International Energy Conservation <br />Code as part of the State Building <br />Code. <br />b) The Legislature should authorize <br />cities to voluntarily adopt a uniform <br />advanced energy building standard <br />with stronger local standards for <br />development and conservation that <br />will help inform the baseline state <br />code development process. <br />SD-30. Building Officials <br />Issue: There is a shortage of certified <br />building officials in Minnesota. This <br />shortage is particularly acute in Greater <br />Minnesota where some cities have trouble <br />finding certified building officials to <br />perform inspections required by state law. <br />Minnesota needs to hire a new generation of <br />certified building officials, and must ensure <br />that current officials have adequate training <br />and opportunity to inspect a wide range of <br />projects. <br />The Department of Labor and Industry <br />(DLI) has authority over state -licensed <br />facilities and public buildings. Pursuant to <br />Minn. Stat. § 326B.106, subd. 2, it must <br />delegate authority to inspect projects on <br />these buildings to a municipality if DLI <br />determines that the municipality has <br />