My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/08/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 02/08/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:51:28 PM
Creation date
2/5/2021 9:12:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/08/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
513
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
standard for physical access to public <br />facilities than required by the ADA and the <br />State Building Code. <br />Response: The League of Minnesota <br />Cities supports changes to the MHRA <br />that will make state accessibility <br />standards compatible with the federal <br />ADA for public services and facilities. <br />The Legislature should clarify that a <br />facility that is in compliance with <br />Accessibility Code provisions of the State <br />Building Code meets the physical access <br />requirements of the MHRA. State law <br />should also specify that accessibility <br />requirements apply to public programs <br />and services as a whole, rather than to <br />each individual aspect of a public <br />program or service. <br />SD-32. Assaults on Code <br />Enforcement Officials <br />Issue: Many city employees and contractors <br />are required to enforce city codes and <br />ordinances and state statutes and rules as <br />part of their job duties. Code enforcement <br />can involve denying a building permit, <br />ordering a landlord to make repairs to rental <br />properties, or fining property owners for <br />failing to abate a nuisance. Because of the <br />nature of their job, code enforcement <br />officials can be subjected to verbal assaults, <br />threats, and physical violence. <br />Minnesota law recognizes the need to <br />protect certain employees whose jobs make <br />it more likely that they will be the target of <br />assaults by escalating assault charges from <br />fifth to fourth degree for the assaults of <br />peace officers, firefighters, school officials, <br />and "public employees with mandated <br />duties". Minn. Stat. § 609.2231, subd. 6, <br />specifically defines "public employees with <br />mandated duties" as agricultural inspectors, <br />occupational safety and health inspectors, <br />child protection workers, public health <br />35 <br />nurses, animal control officers, and <br />probation or parole officers. An assault on <br />one of these employees who is engaged in <br />the performance of a duty mandated by law, <br />court order, or ordinance, is a gross <br />misdemeanor if the person knows the <br />employee is engaged in the performance of <br />official duties and inflicts demonstrable <br />bodily harm. <br />Under current law, an assault on a code <br />enforcement official not enumerated in <br />Minn. Stat. § 609.2231, subd. 6, while <br />performing official business can only be <br />charged as fifth degree assault, a <br />misdemeanor, unless it results in substantial <br />bodily harm. All code enforcement officials <br />should be afforded the same protections <br />under Minnesota Statutes, and the legislature <br />should amend the statute to expand the <br />employees covered by the statute. <br />Response: The legislature should expand <br />Minn. Stat. § 609.2231, subd. 6, to include <br />code enforcement officials. The term code <br />enforcement official should be defined <br />broadly to include public employees and <br />contractors whose jobs require them to <br />enforce all administrative codes, rules, <br />ordinances, and state laws. <br />SD-33. Restrictions on Possession of <br />Firearms <br />Issue: The Minnesota Citizens Personal <br />Protection Act, also known as "conceal -and - <br />carry," prohibits guns on most school <br />properties but forbids other local units of <br />government from prohibiting loaded <br />firearms on their properties. The <br />inconsistencies in the law's treatment of <br />different kinds of properties have caused <br />confusion about how the law applies to <br />multi -use facilities, such as municipal ice <br />arenas used for school -sponsored programs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.