Laserfiche WebLink
relinquished, in the interest of helping <br />defendants deal with addiction. <br />Response: The League of Minnesota <br />Cities supports the efforts of drug courts <br />to address substance abuse and reduce <br />crime. The League supports funding for <br />additional drug courts. <br />SD-51. Drug Paraphernalia <br />Issue: Cities throughout the state struggle <br />with local businesses selling items primarily <br />designed to enable illegal drug use. Current <br />state law only prohibits use, possession, <br />delivery, and advertisements of drug <br />paraphernalia. The law inadequately defines <br />the term "drug paraphernalia," and leaves <br />cities to pass more effective ordinances <br />"prohibiting or otherwise regulating the <br />manufacture, delivery, possession, or <br />advertisement of drug paraphernalia." <br />Many cities have adopted their own <br />ordinances to regulate drug paraphernalia, <br />including specifically prohibiting sales. But <br />for a variety of reasons, business owners <br />routinely challenge these ordinances as <br />unconstitutional and then successfully <br />invoke virulent public outcry on that basis. <br />This experience along with costly court <br />challenges discourages other cities from <br />taking similar steps to curb illegal drug <br />activity, and leaves most cities only able to <br />enforce an inadequate state law. <br />Most states immediately around Minnesota <br />define "drug paraphernalia" in a detailed <br />way based on a 1979 model federal law <br />designed to avoid constitutional issues. <br />Minnesota does not. Federal law and the law <br />of half the states immediately around <br />Minnesota explicitly ban sales of drug <br />paraphernalia, but Minnesota does not. The <br />current state of the law arguably makes drug <br />paraphernalia easier to obtain in Minnesota <br />47 <br />than in the states immediately surrounding <br />it. <br />Response: The League of Minnesota <br />Cities supports strengthening the current <br />statutory prohibition on drug <br />paraphernalia, including improving the <br />statutory definition of "drug <br />paraphernalia" and explicitly prohibiting <br />sales. <br />SD-52. Regulation of Massage <br />Therapists <br />Issue: The state does not currently license <br />nor register massage therapists. Minn. Stat. <br />ch. 146A is the Complementary and <br />Alternative Health Care Practices Act which <br />identifies prohibited provider conduct and <br />authorizes the Minnesota Department of <br />Health to take disciplinary action against <br />noncompliant providers who are not <br />registered or licensed by a health -related <br />licensing board. The office has authority to <br />respond to allegations of prohibited behavior <br />through an investigatory process but this <br />function is triggered mainly by consumer <br />complaints and there is no requirement that <br />the office take any action. Additionally, <br />resources for these purposes have been <br />severely limited. <br />In absence of any required statewide <br />standards or regulation, several cities have <br />entered the traditional state domain of <br />health-care licensure by enacting ordinances <br />that require all massage therapists to obtain <br />a local professional license and many cities <br />have also required bricks and mortar <br />establishments to obtain a business license. <br />These ordinances help local law <br />enforcement officers to differentiate <br />between legitimate providers and businesses <br />engaged in sex trafficking and prostitution <br />as well as provide for health and sanitation <br />standards. <br />