Laserfiche WebLink
affordable prices. High fixed costs, low <br />density, and short-term return -on -investment <br />thresholds for private sector providers <br />contribute to the lack of broadband across <br />the state. Investing in universal broadband <br />access has substantial local and regional <br />economic benefits for communities of all <br />sizes. Cities and other local units of <br />government are facilitating the deployment <br />of broadband services to increase <br />connectivity, reliability, availability, and <br />affordability for residents and businesses <br />through a variety of models, including <br />municipal broadband and public -private <br />partnerships. However, attempts have been <br />made to restrict cities from providing <br />telecommunications services, particularly in <br />unserved or underserved areas. Recent court <br />cases have overturned interpretation by the <br />Federal Communications Commission <br />(FCC) that states may not limit the extension <br />of municipal broadband services from one <br />city to another. <br />Due to the high costs of broadband <br />infrastructure, the state has expanded its role <br />to identify and formulate tools to expand <br />broadband access. The Office of Broadband <br />Development within the Department of <br />Employment and Economic Development <br />(DEED) created in 2013 formally <br />established a partnership between the state <br />and local communities to deploy high-speed <br />Internet in unserved and underserved areas. <br />The Office supports broadband expansion <br />through broadband mapping and managing <br />the state's broadband grant program. <br />Additional state action occurred during the <br />2016 legislative session when the legislature <br />reestablished state speed and adoption goals <br />under Minn. Stat. § 237.012. In addition to <br />the state's focus on extending broadband to <br />unserved areas, Minnesota must also be on <br />the cutting edge for next -generation <br />broadband investments. <br />83 <br />Response: To promote economic <br />development and achieve state broadband <br />goals, the Legislature, Governor's office, <br />and state agencies should: <br />a) Identify and implement actions for the <br />state to reach and maintain a position <br />in the top five states for broadband <br />speed that is universally accessible to <br />residents and businesses; <br />b) Make significant investments to the <br />Border -to -Border Broadband Grant <br />Program and continue to encourage <br />public/private sector collaboration <br />including options that use technologies <br />such as wireless that are scalable to <br />meet statutory speed goals and are <br />consistent with LE-19 to cost- <br />effectively expand broadband service <br />access; <br />c) Support measures to authorize and <br />encourage cities and other local units <br />of government to play a direct role in <br />providing broadband infrastructure <br />and/or services; <br />d) Remove barriers to the exercise of <br />local authority to provide such <br />services, including repeal of Minn. <br />Stat. § 237.19, that requires a <br />supermajority voter approval for the <br />provision of local phone service by a <br />local unit of government; <br />e) Offer incentives to private sector <br />service providers to respond to local <br />or regional needs and to collaborate <br />with cities and other public entities to <br />deploy broadband infrastructure <br />capable of delivering sufficient <br />bandwidth and capacity to meet <br />immediate and future local needs; <br />f) Adopt policies which seek to position <br />Minnesota as a state of choice for <br />testing next -generation broadband <br />technologies; <br />Affirm that cities have the authority to <br />partner with private entities to finance <br />g) <br />