My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/08/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 02/08/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:51:28 PM
Creation date
2/5/2021 9:12:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/08/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
513
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
limits can hinder the planning of future <br />development. <br />Response: The Legislature should <br />increase or repeal levy limits or increase <br />the levying authority for EDA, HRA, and <br />port authority activities in Minn. Stat. ch. <br />469. <br />LE-28. Tax Increment Financing <br />(TIF) <br />Issue: TIF is the most important tool <br />available to fund community development <br />and redevelopment efforts. Over time, the <br />TIF law has become increasingly complex <br />as the Legislature seeks to provide cities <br />with the resources to grow the state's <br />economy while maintaining limits on the use <br />of property taxes. Cities need greater <br />flexibility to use TIF for community and <br />economic development that support a city's <br />residents and businesses. Further <br />restrictions of TIF would render the tool less <br />effective and will hinder local efforts to <br />support job creation, housing, <br />redevelopment and remediation. <br />The need for flexibility has been accentuated <br />due to the pandemic economic downturn <br />which has dramatically slowed existing <br />projects that must continue to comply with <br />statutory timelines. Many projects will have <br />difficulty meeting time -line requirements <br />such as the five-year rule without special <br />legislation authorization. <br />Further restrictions of TIF would render the <br />tool less effective and will hinder local <br />efforts to support job creation, housing, <br />redevelopment and remediation. <br />Response: The Legislature should not <br />enact future TIF law restrictions, rather <br />the Legislature should: <br />90 <br />a) Amend Minn. Stat. § 469.1763, subd. <br />4, to clarify that tax increment pooling <br />limitations are calculated on a <br />cumulative basis. <br />b) Modify Minn. Stat. 469.174, subd. 10, <br />to allow a redevelopment district to be <br />established where only 50 percent of <br />the buildings are required to be <br />structurally substandard to a degree <br />requiring substantial renovation or <br />clearance. <br />c) Clarify that expenditures for the <br />necessary maintenance of properties <br />within TIF districts are an allowable <br />use of tax increment under Minn. Stat. <br />§ 469.176, subd. 4; <br />d) Allow term extensions for <br />redevelopment districts which are <br />taking longer to develop; <br />e) Amend Minn. Stat. § 469.1763, subd. <br />3, to eliminate the "Five-year Rule" <br />for districts that are taking longer to <br />develop; <br />f) Amend Minn. Stat. § 469.174, subd. <br />25, to provide time limits on the <br />"deemed increment" created by land <br />sales, leases and loans, and allow <br />authorities greater flexibility in the <br />use of lease revenues to fund ongoing <br />operations; <br />Expand the use of TIF to assist in the <br />development of technological <br />infrastructure and products, <br />biotechnology, research, multi -modal <br />transportation and transit -oriented <br />development, restoration of <br />designated historic structures, non - <br />retail commercial projects, and non - <br />wetland areas where unstable/non- <br />buildable soils exist; <br />h) Increase the ability of TIF to facilitate <br />redevelopment and housing activities; <br />i) Modify the housing district income <br />qualification level requirements to <br />allow the levels to vary according to <br />individual communities; <br />g) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.