My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/08/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 02/08/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:51:28 PM
Creation date
2/5/2021 9:12:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/08/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
513
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
contribution increases for Police and Fire <br />Plan employers and active employees and a <br />modified cost of living adjustment (COLA) <br />for retirees. <br />Recent adjustments to balance PERA plan <br />costs have largely focused on contribution <br />increases rather than benefit adjustments. On <br />January 1, 2015, the employer and employee <br />contribution rates for the PERA General <br />Plan each increased by 0.25% of salary, <br />resulting in the current employer rate of 7.5 <br />percent of salary and an employee rate of <br />6.5 percent of salary. For PERA Police and <br />Fire (P&F) employees, the employer <br />contribution was increased to 16.95% and <br />the employee contribution was increased to <br />11.3 % beginning January 1, 2019 and then <br />the employer contribution was increased to <br />17.7% and the employee contribution was <br />increased to 11.8% beginning January 1, <br />2020. <br />For the PERA General Plan, an additional <br />one percent employer contribution is <br />required under Minn. Stat. § 353.27, subd. <br />3a, which will continue until the actuarial <br />value of the plan assets equal or exceed the <br />liabilities. Employees do not have a similar <br />obligation to help the General Plan reach <br />full funding. When the additional employer <br />contribution was increased to 0.43 percent in <br />1997, the state instituted a PERA aid <br />program (Minn. Stat. § 273.1385) for <br />employers to partially offset the cost of <br />increased employer contributions. However, <br />the PERA aid payment rate is frozen at 1999 <br />levels, while the additional employer <br />contribution has since increased from .43% <br />to 1.0%. <br />Response: The League of Minnesota <br />Cities supports the sustainability <br />modifications enacted by the legislature in <br />2018 and continues to oppose any benefit <br />improvements for retirees or active <br />employees until the financial health of the <br />110 <br />General Plan and the Police and Fire Plan <br />is restored. <br />For the PERA General Plan, any further <br />increases in employer contributions <br />should only be considered by the <br />Legislature after other measures have <br />been considered, including: <br />a) An increase in employee <br />contributions so that employees and <br />employers truly bear the same <br />responsibility to bring the pension <br />plans to full funding; or <br />b) The removal of the cap on PERA <br />Pension Aid payments under Minn. <br />Stat. § 273.1385 and the extension of <br />the aid program after FY2020, so the <br />state equalizes the contributions of <br />employees and employers. <br />The League also supports: <br />a) Modifications to the PERA eligibility <br />guidelines to take into account <br />temporary, seasonal, unique part- <br />time, and student employment <br />situations in cities, particularly in <br />recreational operations. These <br />modifications should include the use <br />of pro -rated service credit, which <br />would make PERA consistent with the <br />other major Minnesota pension plans. <br />b) A comprehensive review of exclusions <br />from pension participation with the <br />goal of simplifying current eligibility <br />guidelines. Such a review should also <br />include a possible revision of current <br />penalties for employers that fail to <br />report covered employees to ensure <br />that these penalties are not overly <br />harsh and punitive. <br />c) The transfer of all school district <br />employees out of the PERA General <br />Plan and into another fund that is <br />more appropriate for school district <br />employees as long as the change would <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.