My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/08/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 02/08/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:51:28 PM
Creation date
2/5/2021 9:12:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/08/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
513
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
g) <br />Opposes any mandatory, centralized, <br />statewide health insurance option for <br />active or retired city employees. <br />h) Supports changing Minn. Stat. § <br />62A.21 to place reasonable limits on <br />health care continuation for former <br />spouses, similar to the Federal <br />COBRA law. <br />HR-13. Workers' Compensation <br />Issue: Rising medical costs are an <br />increasingly serious problem for all <br />employers and insurers, and now represent <br />over half of all loss costs within the <br />workers' compensation system. Medical <br />costs will be a major driver of future <br />workers' compensation premium increases. <br />In addition, the 2013 legislature added post - <br />traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a <br />compensable injury and in 2014, a <br />Minnesota Supreme Court decision found <br />that provisions in the Workers' <br />Compensation statute which allow workers <br />compensation benefits for permanent and <br />total disabilities to be offset by disability <br />benefits and pension benefits such as Social <br />Security does not apply to retirement <br />benefits of the Public Employees Retirement <br />Association. In 2018, the Legislature <br />modified Minn. Stat. § 176.011 subd. 15, <br />which defines an occupational disease to add <br />a rebuttable presumption to a diagnosis of <br />PTSD in certain public safety and related <br />personnel. In 2020, the legislature modified <br />Minn. Stat. § 176.011, subd. 15 to <br />temporarily add a diagnosis of COVID-19 <br />for peace officers, firefighters, paramedics <br />and other defined employee classes as a <br />presumed occupational disease covered by <br />the workers' compensation system. The <br />Minnesota Legislature also regularly <br />considered proposals to expand the heart, <br />lung and infectious disease presumptions for <br />public safety workers, and to make the <br />presumptions more conclusive and difficult <br />114 <br />to rebut. These types of benefit expansions <br />would further increase municipal workers' <br />compensation costs. <br />Response: Legislative action is necessary <br />to address increasing workers' <br />compensation costs, particularly rising <br />medical costs. The League of Minnesota <br />Cities supports: <br />a) Use of the Workers Compensation <br />Advisory Council (WCAC) system to <br />consider proposals for changes to the <br />workers' compensation law, and urges <br />the WCAC and the Legislature to <br />approve medical cost containment <br />reforms. <br />b) Filling an existing WCAC employer <br />vacancy with a public -sector employer <br />representative or adding a designated <br />public -sector employer representative <br />to the WCAC. <br />c) Continuing the WCRA as the <br />mandatory workers' compensation <br />reinsurer for insurers and self - <br />insurers in Minnesota and supports <br />modifying state statutes to treat PTSD <br />events involving several affected <br />parties as one occurrence for retention <br />purposes, thereby reducing the <br />exposure of self -insured entities and <br />the statewide insurance pools. Such a <br />change would not have any effect on <br />the benefit an individual employee <br />would receive. <br />d) Legislation that would disallow the <br />"stacking" of PERA retirement <br />benefits and Workers Compensation <br />benefits due to the fact that some <br />injured employees could receive total <br />compensation from workers' <br />compensation and PERA retirement <br />benefits that would be well above the <br />salary that they had been earning and <br />the fact that the costs would ultimately <br />be passed on to cities and their <br />taxpayers. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.