Laserfiche WebLink
0 Providing funding and authority to <br />the Data Practices Office to engage in <br />the rulemaking process to establish <br />standards and procedures related to <br />requests and responses to data <br />practices requests that impose <br />significant burdens on government <br />entities. <br />Amending the MGDPA to limit what <br />is considered public applicant data to <br />better balance the value of public data <br />with the cost related to data practices <br />compliance. <br />h) Allowing political subdivisions to <br />charge the same amount for copies of <br />motor vehicle incident reports issued <br />by local police and fire departments as <br />the commissioner of public safety. <br />g) <br />The League of Minnesota Cities opposes: <br />a) Further increasing the maximum <br />exemplary damages that courts may <br />impose against government entities, <br />including cities, found to have violated <br />the MGDPA; further increasing the <br />maximum civil penalty that may be <br />imposed when a court order is issued <br />to compel a government entity to <br />comply with MGDPA; or any <br />statutory change that would make it a <br />mandatory civil penalty to compel <br />compliance under the MGDPA. <br />b) Repealing of the administrative <br />remedies provisions adopted by the <br />2010 Legislature to address disputes <br />regarding MGDPA compliance issues. <br />DP-2. Records Retention <br />Compliance Costs <br />Issue: The Official Records Act requires <br />government entities to "make and preserve <br />all records necessary to a full and accurate <br />knowledge of their official activities." In <br />accordance, cities must establish a records <br />119 <br />retention schedule, and maintain and destroy <br />official records according to this schedule. <br />There are rigorous requirements for any <br />changes to a city's records retention <br />schedule, including getting approval from <br />the statutorily -created Records Disposition <br />Panel, which strikes an appropriate balance <br />between the government entity's decision - <br />making role in determining retention and <br />disposition of official records with the <br />public's right to know the government <br />entity's official activities. <br />Response: As the cost of complying with <br />the records management laws increases, <br />the League supports providing additional <br />state funding to assist political <br />subdivisions with meeting the increasing <br />complexity of managing government <br />records. <br />The League of Minnesota Cities opposes <br />changing the current record management <br />requirements and statutory definitions. If <br />changes are needed, subject matter <br />experts should make recommendations <br />through the records retention schedule <br />process. <br />DP-3. Updating the Minnesota <br />Government Data Practices Act <br />Issue: The Minnesota Government Data <br />Practices Act (MGDPA) was first enacted in <br />1979. Almost 40 years later, times have <br />changed dramatically. In particular, there <br />has been exponential change in technology. <br />In 1979, cities were largely maintaining data <br />in paper form, computers had just become <br />viable for home users, word processing had <br />just become a reality, the first point -and - <br />shoot, autofocus camera came on the <br />market, and the internet was still about a <br />decade on the horizon. <br />While the MGDPA was originally drafted to <br />be future thinking by contemplating the <br />