My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/08/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 02/08/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:51:28 PM
Creation date
2/5/2021 9:12:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/08/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
513
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minnesota Department of Administration <br />issued an advisory opinion (13-009) that <br />allowed a city's use of Skype to conduct a <br />remote meeting under Minn. Stat. § 13.02, <br />subd. 1. A "common sense" approach was <br />applied to technology questions, which <br />recognizes the difficulty cities must face <br />when interpreting the Open Meeting Law in <br />light of ever -changing technology. <br />The Open Meeting Law and other statutes <br />also allows certain state bodies to conduct <br />meetings via telephone and other electronic <br />means, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 13D.015. <br />This useful tool should be expanded to local <br />government to assure that members can <br />attend meetings remotely in this ever - <br />evolving virtual world using current and <br />future technology. <br />Technology has outpaced the Open Meeting <br />Law. Recent city response to COVID-19 has <br />illustrated that remote participation for <br />meetings can allow for meaningful <br />interaction among the city council and with <br />the public. While the legislature recently <br />changed the law to allow for greater <br />participation by interactive television when <br />a state of emergency has been declared, this <br />change was for a limited amount of time. It <br />is unknown how long the effects of this <br />health pandemic will last beyond any <br />declared state of emergency. Cities are in <br />need of greater flexibility now to utilize <br />technology for meetings to protect the health <br />of elected officials, city staff, and the public. <br />Cities also need to keep pace with the virtual <br />world by having discretion to use remote <br />technology in the future, similar to the <br />current discretion of the State of Minnesota. <br />The use of Facebook, Twitter, and other <br />social media creates opportunities for cities <br />to reach more constituents and to share more <br />information faster than ever before. Social <br />media creates new opportunities for citizen <br />participation, and citizens increasingly <br />124 <br />expect that their elected officials will <br />provide them with information via the <br />internet and social media sites. This <br />expectation is not always consistent with <br />laws that require citizens to attend a meeting <br />in order to participate in local government. <br />The use of social media by elected officials <br />raises issues of compliance with laws that <br />were drafted before social media existed, <br />and increases the likelihood of unintentional <br />violations. In recognition of these issues, <br />the 2014 Legislature created a social media <br />exemption to the Open Meeting Law, Minn. <br />Stat. § 13D.065, which states that the use of <br />social media by members of a public body <br />does not violate the law so long as the use is <br />limited to exchanges with all members of <br />the general public. <br />Response: The League of Minnesota <br />Cities supports the Department of <br />Administration's interpretation of the <br />interactive television provision of the <br />Open Meeting Law, and encourages the <br />Legislature to authorize cities to conduct <br />official meetings by telephone or other <br />electronic means, as allowed by Minn. <br />Stat. § 13D.015, <br />The League supports the 2014 change to <br />the Open Meeting Law, which grants <br />cities and elected officials reasonable <br />flexibility to use social media to <br />communicate with citizens while <br />maintaining the protections of the Open <br />Meeting Law. <br />The League opposes any change to the <br />open meeting law that would expand the <br />award of attorney's fees to unintentional <br />violations. <br />DP-10. Exceptions to the Open <br />Meeting Law <br />Issue: The purpose of the Open Meeting <br />Law generally requires that all meetings of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.