My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/08/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 02/08/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:51:28 PM
Creation date
2/5/2021 9:12:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/08/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
513
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
fund balance composed of cash flow funds, <br />savings for projects, and rainy -day reserves <br />to maintain high level bond ratings and to <br />minimize borrowing costs. Although the size <br />of a city's fund balance should be <br />determined through local financial needs <br />and local preferences, some cities are being <br />criticized for maintaining "excessive" <br />reserves. As the recent pandemic unfolded, <br />there were calls to delay tax payments by <br />property owners, citing city fund balances as <br />evidence that cities could absorb cash flow <br />delays. <br />The Office of the State Auditor (OSA) <br />report measures city fund balances on <br />December 31, shortly after the city receives <br />its largest sources of revenue from the <br />property tax and state aid distributions. <br />Measuring at this time, however, yields a <br />picture of a high fund balance even though <br />the city will spend down these funds to cash <br />flow the next five to six months of its <br />operations. <br />Response: The state should respect local <br />decisions on adequacy of local fund <br />balances. The League of Minnesota Cities <br />opposes any attempt to divert local <br />reserves to benefit the state budget or use <br />reserves as a rationale for state aid cuts or <br />property tax payment delays. <br />FF-20. Local Option Sales Tax and <br />City Revenue Diversification <br />Issue: Under current state law, the property <br />tax is the only generally accessible form of <br />local tax revenue for cities. Allowing cities <br />to diversify their revenue stream would help <br />prevent rapid additional future reliance on <br />the property tax. <br />The basic public finance rationale for <br />diversification of local tax systems is rooted <br />in the fact that economists generally agree <br />that there is no perfect tax. Each tax has <br />141 <br />unique strengths and weaknesses and the <br />more intensively any single tax type is used, <br />the more obvious its shortcomings become. <br />For example, the property tax is generally <br />regarded as being very stable throughout the <br />economic cycle and it is considered to be a <br />relatively easy tax to administer and enforce. <br />However, when property tax burdens <br />become too high, there may be negative <br />consequences for other public policy <br />objectives such as business development and <br />home ownership. <br />In addition to avoiding the problems created <br />by excessive reliance on any single tax, a <br />balanced and diversified revenue system for <br />Minnesota cities may create a more <br />favorable business climate and provide for <br />greater stability of revenues to the recipient <br />government unit throughout the course of <br />the economic cycle. <br />Under Minn. Stat. § 297A.99, the <br />Legislature has created a set of local sales <br />tax rules and a defined process by which <br />cities and other political subdivisions can <br />impose a general local option sales tax. <br />Although the statutory process requires the <br />city council to adopt a resolution supporting <br />the local sales tax, the process continues to <br />require the authorization of the local sales <br />tax by the Legislature through the passage of <br />a special law before finally seeking voter <br />approval at a general election. <br />City requests for sales tax authority continue <br />to increase. In 2019, the legislature granted <br />local sales tax authority to an additional 16 <br />cities and in 2020, 20 cities sought new or <br />expanded local sales taxes, however, despite <br />following the revised process enacted in <br />2019, the legislature did not include any of <br />the local proposals in the tax bills advanced <br />in the House and Senate. <br />Response: Cities should be able to <br />diversify their sources of revenues. The <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.