My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
01/14/21
Ramsey
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2020's
>
2021
>
01/14/21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2021 12:36:27 PM
Creation date
2/17/2021 12:36:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
project had been outstanding for over 15 years. He confirmed that the balance in the fund grows <br />each year outside of the operation and maintenance expenses. He commented that the Council <br />would consider the balance of that fund when making the decision as to whether to expend those <br />funds. <br /> <br />Member Heineman asked if the water utility funds could be used for the water treatment plant. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that would be detail that staff at this meeting would be <br />guessing at. He noted that staff can prepare information on how the funds come together and how <br />those funds are intended to be used for future projects. He noted that the Finance Director could <br />be brought in for that future discussion. <br />Member Heineman stated that he would caution that people think about where money is coming <br />from and where it is going in terms of the water treatment plant compared to a façade. <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood replied that the rate study <br />incorporates the proposed improvements that would be needed over time along with the anticipated <br />needs along with operation and maintenance. <br />Chairperson Steffen asked if the pump house item would be the first priority. <br /> <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood commented that the sidewalk on <br />Sapphire would be the first priority as that project is leasing and the pump house would be the <br />second priority. <br /> <br />Chairperson Steffen recognized that funds were saved when the pump house was constructed and <br />this would be the time to improve that element. <br /> <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood agreed that the vision for this area <br />is now known and therefore the design should be solidified so that these elements can move <br />forward. <br /> <br />Chairperson Steffen commented that the pump house is in the center of this area that is used for <br />many different events. He was unsure that a solar canopy would be needed but noted that he would <br />leave that to staff. He stated that if an eyesore of a pump house could be improved to the point <br />where people want to congregate in that area, kudos to staff. He stated that he believes that <br />something needs to be done out there. He stated that the plans are beautiful and whether that full <br />scope is recognized, something needs to be done. <br />Member Howell stated that the plans are lovely. She stated that perhaps priorities of the City and <br />residents should be kept in mind as residents are the customer of the City. She stated that there <br />are large expenditures on the horizon and perhaps this is the wrong priority and timing. She hoped <br />that this could be delayed as she did not believe it is smart to be doing this now. <br />Member Cords stated that he is also against this as it is excessive. He recognized that commitments <br />need to be met but did not believe this the best way to spend money right now. <br />Economic Development Authority/ January 14, 2021 <br />Page 12 of 14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.