Laserfiche WebLink
all of them being of the Woodland Tradition, due to either diagnostic artifacts or archaeological <br />features (i.e. burial mounds). <br /> <br />The relatively high volume of pre-contact sites within two miles of the project area, as well as the <br />indicate the project area exhibits reasonable potential <br />to contain pre-contact cultural material. LiDAR data (provided by MNDNR) was examined in an <br />attempt to identify any visible above-ground features with a potentially archaeological origin. <br />These features were not identified, but viewing the LiDAR hillshade revealed the project area had <br />been submerged in the Mississippi River floodplain in the past. The old river cut is distinct to the <br />point at least two major previous river edges can be identified in the project area hillshade imagery, <br />accompanied by clear sandbar deposits between the current river path and the previous flooded <br />edge (Figure 3). <br /> <br />6.0 RESULTS <br /> <br />Fieldwork was completed on October 9, 14, and 15, 2020. This began with surface survey of the <br />cornfields, cabbage patch, and pumpkin patch on a four to five-meter interval. Surface visibility <br />within all surface-surveyed areas varied between 0 and 80% (see Appendix B for example surface <br />visibility photographs). No cultural materials or archaeological features were identified during the <br />surface survey. <br /> <br />Shovel testing was completed along three separate transects within the wooded portion of the <br />project area. The first transect was located 15-meters northeast and parallel to the southwestern <br />edge of the project area (the closest edge to the Mississippi River), and consisted of 25 shovel tests <br />excavated at 15-meter intervals. All shovel tests were negative for cultural materials. Due to the <br />non-cultural nature of the first transect, the second transect, placed 30-meters northeast and parallel <br />to the first, contained 11 shovel tests excavated on a 30-meter interval. This transect was also <br />negative for cultural material. Acknowledging this tested portion of the wooded area landed at <br />times in the past floodplain, a third transect was placed on the highest ridge at the northeastern <br />edge of the wooded area in an attempt to capture where the cultural activity may have been focused <br />while this area was previously flooded (see the middle flooded river edge noted in the LiDAR <br />Hillshade imagery in Figure 3). This transect consisted of sixteen shovel tests excavated on a 15- <br />meter interval and was also negative for cultural material. See Figure 4 for an illustration of shovel <br />tested and surface surveyed locations. <br /> <br />All shovel tests were excavated to at least 80 centimeters below surface (cmbs), well into subsoils. <br />Soil profiles were notably consistent across the shovel tested areas with the average profile <br />containing 10YR 3/2 silty sandy loam 0 to approximately 20-30cmbs, followed by 10YR 3/3 to <br />10YR 3/6 sand from 20-30cmbs through shovel test termination at 80cmbs. Soils typically became <br />more compact beginning around 50cmbs continuing through 80cmbs. Recorded soils exhibited no <br />signs of human-related disturbance, and reflect the sandy soils deposition expected of the ancient <br />floodplain terrace on which this portion of the project area is located. Considering the depth <br />Phase I Archaeological Survey of Proposed Capstone Homes Housing Development 12 <br />Ramsey, Anoka County, Minnesota <br />Nienow Cultural Consultants, LLC <br /> <br />