Laserfiche WebLink
Neighborhood District, which allows for a mix of residential uses at a net density up to <br />per acre. She indicated the Town Center Development Guidelines establish a brick <br />threshold of 35%, and some of the units do not meet that requirement. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated the maximum front yard the sidewalk is 20 feet. <br />She indicated all of the units meet the front yard setback with the exception of <br />several or: the units in Block 6, due to the curved stated the resolution Would be to <br />either make adjustments to building locations, o ~ variance: She noted that City Code . <br />requires 20 foot driveways for row this requkement. She <br />indicated there is no additional off-stre{ <br /> <br />Associate Planner <br />and the necessary revis/ <br />[,andscaping Plan <br /> <br /> Grading <br />listed in the <br />exceeds the minimum <br /> <br />have been reviewed, <br /> proposed <br /> <br />Associate Geisler advised Staff-is rec plat and <br />preli site plan be forwarded to the City contingent upon <br />c with the City Staff Review Letter. <br /> <br />Case #8: <br /> <br />Public Hearing: <br />Approval of Town Cen~ <br /> <br /> Site Plan <br />of Ramsey Town Center LLC <br /> <br /> Presentatio[] <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler ;tated:!i'~h:a):,the a request for preliminary plat and <br />preliminary site plan appro~a!'!'~i~!'.d4~,el°p 44 homes on approximately <br />9.77 acres in Ramsey To.~n?;~hter. lOth ~he indicated that as submi~ed, the <br /> th <br />prelimina~ plat for the f'~:~:~bg~ has a net densi, of 6.5 uMts per acre. She stated the <br />deveIopmen[, oLthe, p.lat will')h'~:~:~&~constmction of Zeolite S~eet ~ and the other t~ee <br />public streetk gu~0Udd~:ffg:t~e pla~8~}~gicg?d the TC-4a District requires 2 off-s~eet p~k~g <br />spaces, for~ ~ch. jfifi~;?~'~h~:~double~'~~:~d 'driveways provide 4 off-street paring spaces <br /> <br /> .,. ' '' ' ' / <br />AS~°d~te Pla~er Geisler s{~d~?~ Grading and Drabage and Utili~ Plus have been reviewed. <br />SE~.'~d~b~ted a preliminaw ligk~7~g'.~evisions is listed in ~e CiW StaffReview LeEer. She stated <br />Staff ~s'.s~.lI recmwng and re~tewmg updates to the drainage, gadmg, s~eet, and utflzW plans, <br />and addiffonar :inf6~ation.~¥eg'isions may be required once the Staff review is complete. . <br /> <br />Assoctate Pla~er Gelsl'e[mdmated the proposed Landscaping Plan easily exceeds the minimum <br />planting requirement~:::;~(;Ci~ Code. She stated the Plan is acceptable wi~ some minor <br />modifications. . <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler advised that the applicant has made several revisions-since the Staff- <br />report was prepared, and at this time Staff is recgmmending approval of'the preliminary plat and <br />preliminary site plan'contingent on the conditions in the City Staff Review Letter. <br /> <br /> Planning Commission/June 2, 2005 <br /> Page I9 of 22 . <br /> <br />-311- <br /> <br /> <br />