Laserfiche WebLink
indicated the site plan was tabled until April 7, 2005 in order to review architectural elevations <br />and details for the proposed clevelopment. <br /> <br />Assistant Corem unity Development Director Frolik advised that none of the proposed townhouse <br />units meet the brick requirements, however all do include additional colors and architectural <br />elements, meeting the exception criteria. She stated the Town Center Development Guidelines <br />also require 35% brick on units in the TC-4a area, though there is a similar exception process. <br />She indicated Stal"f would recommend the Planning Commission consider requiring additional <br />brick on the units directly ft-oming on Bunker Lake Boulevard. <br /> <br />Phil Detainer, BrightKeys, Inc. stated they agree to bring the units on Bunker Lake Boulevard up <br />to the 35% brick recluirt:ment. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner [3rauer, seconded by-Commissioner Van Scoy to recommend approval <br />of the site plan of Town Center Gardens 3rd Addition with the recommendatic~n that the units on <br />Bunker Lake Boulevard meet the 35°,/o brick.requirements. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy stated he wonders how it will look with brick along the Bunker Lake <br />Boulewu'd units, but different fi'om the rest. <br /> <br />Mr. Dommer stated they deliberately planned a mix of units so they do not achieve the cookie <br />cutter took. He indicated there are some components that tie all the units together, such as arbor <br />elements, brick, and stone. He stated there are three builders involved; Pulte Homes, Generation <br />Homes and BrightKeys. He believes the areas will tie together nicely without being exactly the <br />same throughout the area. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt noted that north of Unit 16 it does not appear that the sidewalk connects the <br />east/west street with the north/south street in the same section. <br /> <br />Mr. Detainer indicated that is a mistake,-and it will be connected. He stated the idea is to funnel <br />traffic to that sidewalk. <br /> <br />Co,nmissioner Watson stated they had talked about a walkable overpass to the Town Center,. <br />which is clearly not shown. <br /> <br />City Engineer Linton stated there is a dollar value attached to a bridge. He noted the intersection <br />just west of this will be signalized, and is part of the Bunker Lake Boulevard improvements <br />slated for 2007. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Brauer, Van Scoy, Levine, <br />Shepherd, and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Johnson. <br /> <br />Case/45 <br /> <br />Public Hearing - Request for Preliminary Plat and Site'Plan Approval of <br />Rum River Estates; Case of National Growth, LLC <br /> <br />Pla n ning Commission/April 7, 2005 <br /> Page 9 ot'23 <br /> <br />-347- <br /> <br /> <br />