Laserfiche WebLink
o <br />,U <br />1 O :-E <br />o <br />m -0 <br />0 0 <br />O 0 <br />o ' <br />E <br />0 <br />0 <br />v) <br />— .X <br />a) <br />w <br />E <br />O <br />a) 3 <br />o) <br />o0 <br />o)c <br />i <br />0 <br />_cO <br />o 0)Q <br />O w 0) <br />'- 0 C' <br />6 m O O <br />> g <br />O <br />O N <br />D>0_Q <br />> E <br />a0 0 a) <br />32a> <br />°00_Jz°(-o <br />0 <br />tom} 0,6 <br />1- <br />0 0 CL Lho <br />l000000 <br />Ih <br />• <br />oi00000 <br />pldo <br />0000000000 <br />IIIII <br />IIo <br />a) <br />a--+ <br />n <br />a--+ <br />c <br />0 <br />U <br />0 <br />0 <br />2 <br />ce <br />ce <br />J <br />0 <br />v) <br />ro <br />a) <br />7 <br />c <br />u <br />technical assistance, funding, or other support <br />for projects upstream of the LRRWMO <br />C <br />0 <br />u <br />V) <br />Include more detailed discussion about <br />0 <br />U <br />D <br />a) <br />L_ <br />0 <br />U <br />ra <br />0 <br />. <br />D <br />0 <br />Q <br />a) <br />7 <br />O <br />s <br />U <br />a) <br />0 <br />U <br />0) <br />C <br />D <br />v <br />.c <br />L <br />CU <br />N <br />0 <br />u <br />C <br />03 <br />0 <br />CU <br />V) <br />i <br />00 <br />T <br />a) <br />reduction elements in future permit program <br />i <br />-0 0 <br />N a--' <br />C <br />v) a--' <br />L C <br />N <br />_o Q <br />O <br />a) <br />v) <br />a) <br />co <br />0 <br />Q <br />L <br />0 <br />U <br />c <br />assessment into the Plan <br />program to identify locations where future <br />improvements should be concentrated. <br />opportunities for the LRRWMO to contribute <br />to upstream projects that will achieve <br />cumulative water quality benefits in the Lower <br />N <br />v) 7 <br />7 <br />co v) ' L <br />s �� N 0 <br />Q s D _C <br />no waterbodies in the <br />LRRWMO are impaired for chloride, portions <br />of the watershed are identified in the "road <br />>18%" area which is a critical area for <br />v) <br />a) <br />implementation, per the MPCA. <br />O <br />0 <br />a) <br />ate--' <br />a_, <br />co <br />a) <br />a� <br />O <br />> <br />s <br />v) <br />U <br />0 <br />2 <br />ce <br />J <br />know where water quality improvement <br />projects are most needed within the <br />E <br />- <br />0 <br />0 <br />U <br />N <br />L <br />v <br />+-' <br />Cl <br />CT <br />a) <br />L <br />> <br />tz <br />c13 <br />a) <br />4— <br />cro <br />the LRRWMO. <br />suspended solids <br />i <br />R3 <br />E <br />ce <br />w <br />and other water quality issues in the Rum <br />River, but does not discuss upstream loading. <br />Section III.A.5 of the 2011 Plan notes that <br />chloride concentrations in the Rum River <br />D <br />E <br />co <br />a✓ <br />V) <br />0 <br />0 <br />0 <br />E <br />ra <br />La._) <br />v) <br />Q <br />D <br />increase from <br />are below standards. <br />Subwatershed Assessments <br />The 2011 Plan does not identify priority areas <br />for water quality improvement projects. The <br />scale of current water quality modeling from <br />MPCA is insufficient for targeting of projects. <br />