Laserfiche WebLink
6115.0730 <br />MINNESOTA RULES 104 <br />proposed or permitted appropriation in the vicinity the applicant or permittee shall be responsible <br />for all costs necessary to provide an adequate supply with the same quality and quantity as prior to <br />the applicant's or permittee's interference. <br />(2) If an existing well provides an adequate domestic water supply but does not meet <br />state health standards and such well would no longer serve as an adequate supply because of the <br />proposed or permitted appropriation in the vicinity, the applicant or permittee shall be responsible <br />for that portion of costs of providing an adequate water supply, but shall not be responsible for <br />those costs necessary to bring the domestic well(s) to state health standards. <br />B. The complainant shall, within ten days from the receipt of the notarized written offer, <br />respond to the commissioner in writing either accepting the offer or making argument on why the <br />offer is not reasonable. If no response is received from the complainant, within the time limit, the <br />commissioner shall dismiss the complaint. <br />C. If the offer is not accepted, the commissioner shall make a decision based on the written <br />offer and arguments and available facts, within ten days as follows: <br />(1) that the applicant or permittee has submitted a reasonable offer, the commissioner <br />shall issue or continue the permit involved; <br />(2) that the applicant or permittee has not submitted a reasonable offer, the commissioner, <br />after notice and opportunity for hearing, shall deny, modify, or terminate the permit involved; <br />(3) that there is a need for a public hearing in which case it is ordered. <br />Statutory Authority: MS s 103G.315; 105.415 <br />Published Electronically: June 11, 2008 <br />6115.0740 WATER USE CONFLICTS. <br />Subpart 1. Conflict defined. For the purpose of these rules a conflict occurs where the available <br />supply of waters of the state in a given area is limited to the extent that there are competing demands <br />among existing and proposed users which exceed the reasonably available waters. Existing and <br />proposed appropriations could in this situation endanger the supply of waters of the state so that <br />the public health, safety, and welfare would be impaired. <br />Subp. 2. Procedure. Whenever the total withdrawals and uses of ground or surface waters <br />would exceed the available supply based on established resource protection limits, including <br />protection elevations and protected flows for surface water and safe yields for groundwater, resulting <br />in a conflict among proposed users and existing legal users the following shall apply: <br />A. In no case shall a permittee be considered to have established a right of use or <br />appropriation by obtaining a permit. <br />B. The commissioner shall analyze and evaluate the following: <br />(1) the reasonableness for use of water by the proposed and existing users; <br />Copyright © 2019 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. <br />