Laserfiche WebLink
6115.0960 <br />MINNESOTA RULES 116 <br />The proposed purposes shall be consistent with the public rights in the public waters of the state. <br />When a district is proposed for the purpose of conducting a feasibility study of the sources of and <br />solutions to lake problems, the proposal shall demonstrate an understanding that subsequent lake <br />restoration measures may require modification of the district's boundaries and statement of purposes, <br />pursuant to part 6115.0980, subpart 1, and Minnesota Statutes, section 103B.575. <br />Subp. 5. Technical feasibility of proposed plans and programs. The proposal shall <br />demonstrate the technical feasibility of the proposed plans and programs, or provide for the <br />determination of technical feasibility. <br />Subp. 6. Adequacy of proposed means of financing. The proposal shall demonstrate capability <br />of raising sufficient funds to meet district purposes, to ensure continuity of district operations, and <br />to meet the requirements of these parts. <br />Subp. 7. Adequacy of procedures for planning, decision -making, and public <br />involvement. The proposal shall assure consideration of the interests of concerned citizens both <br />within and outside the boundaries of the proposed district. The proposal shall include the <br />identification of varying and often conflicting interests regarding water and related land management <br />in and around the proposed district, and procedures to assure the consideration of such diverse <br />interests so that decisions are made in the best overall interests of fairness and public health, safety, <br />and welfare. <br />Subp. 8. Public access. The proposed plan shall provide for public access when adequate <br />public access consistent with size of the lake, the extent of public interest in using the lake, and the <br />combined uses of the lake is unavailable. Service charges may not be imposed on the use of a public <br />access if other units of government cost share the acquisition, development, or maintenance of the <br />public access. <br />Subp. 9. Adequacy of long-range monitoring of environmental effects of district <br />programs. The proposed plan shall demonstrate an understanding of potential environmental <br />effects of the proposed district plans and programs, and provide for a long-range monitoring of <br />such effects. <br />Subp. 10. Coordination with other special purpose districts. The proposal shall demonstrate <br />how the proposed district programs will be coordinated with existing special purpose districts <br />formed for water and related land management. Examples of such units of government are watershed <br />districts, sanitary districts, drainage and conservancy districts, lake conservation districts, and soil <br />and water conservation districts. Lake improvement districts shall not be established where a special <br />purpose unit of government for water and related land management exists which can implement <br />the purposes of the proposed lake improvement district, unless written approval is acquired from <br />such unit of government or from the commissioner. The proposal should demonstrate efforts in <br />good faith to resolve at the local level any conflicts between an existing special purpose district <br />and the proposed lake improvement district. <br />Statutory Authority: MS s 103B.511; 3 78. 41 <br />Published Electronically: June 11, 2008 <br />Copyright © 2019 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. <br />