Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Bona commented that he would be happy to pass those comments on and can recommend that <br />to their production team. He stated that it is a significant process to make a change to every home <br />but would be happy to share the comment and get feedback. <br />Commissioner Anderson referenced the northeast corner, specifically lots 16 through 20, noting <br />that those lots appear to be less than 40 feet in width and asked for details. <br />Mr. Bakritges stated that those lots are not less than 40 feet, as they are measured at the setback <br />and not the right-of-way. <br />Chairperson Bauer commented that he lives in Riverstone North and has not had a problem with <br />the 29-foot width. <br />Mr. Bona commented that the narrower road provides a benefit to calming traffic, as traffic travels <br />at higher speeds on wider roads. <br />John Dehen, 14806 Bowers Drive, stated that he was previously a member of the Ramsey City <br />Council before transitioning to being a District Court Judge. He commented that virtually no one <br />along Bowers Drive likes the density higher than it needs to be. He recognized the concept that if <br />someone does not want something to be built next to them, they should purchase the land <br />themselves. He commented that with the required amendments, it is an ability for the City to <br />follow the plan that was set forth before them. He asked why the number of houses is being packed <br />in above what is allowed by the Comprehensive Plan and zoning. He used the example of 29-foot <br />roads, which developers like because they are less costly and allow more lots, but they are not <br />good for cities and maintenance. He believed that higher density housing should continue to be <br />concentrated around The COR rather than increasing the density in this area. He stated that often <br />sidewalks are setback into yards with tree planting between the road and sidewalk while other <br />times sidewalks are against the road and asked which option this plan would propose. He stated <br />that this is an opportunity for the Commission to require the developer to follow the guidance of <br />the Comprehensive Plan and not increase the density in this more rural area. He appreciated the <br />architectural considerations included in this plan to ensure that all the homes would not look the <br />same. He commented that developers will come and go but residents often remain in the <br />community for longer terms. He asked the Commission to deny the amendment to the <br />Comprehensive Plan and require the developer to rework its plan to meet the guidance of the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />Dave Nathe, 14453 Llama Street, stated that he owns the adjoining property. He asked what would <br />happen with Lazy Dayz RV, as that business parks on both sides of the street. He asked if there <br />would be a buffer zone or fence buffering his property. He asked if the ponding area on the site <br />would be increased or whether another ponding area would be added. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that he will work with Lazy Dayz to evaluate the <br />parking as he believed the intent was to only allow parking on one side of the street. He <br />commented that as the connection for this development is made that parking issue will become <br />more important. He stated that the Nathe property is undeveloped and abuts 65-foot lots. He <br />Planning Commission/ January 7, 2021 <br />Page 13 of 19 <br />