My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/04/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/04/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:07:46 AM
Creation date
2/24/2021 11:30:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/04/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill presented the staff report stating staff recommends approval <br />of the project with the contingencies noted in the staff report. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that in general he likes the plan but is concerned with the safety of <br />the residents on Bowers Drive. He recognized that those residents do not like the concept of an <br />additional access but stated that he believes that is critical for safety and without that he cannot <br />support this request. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator commented that originally staff proposed that connection, but it did <br />not move forward. He stated that he would not want to tie that to this project as the developer is <br />not responsible for that. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bauer commented that this development has nothing to do with a second access for <br />Bowers Drive, as that will continue to be an issue regardless of this proposal. <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson asked if this development would have an HOA and private streets. He <br />commented that the street width seems narrow. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that he would let the developer speak to whether <br />there would be an HOA. He stated that in terms of road widths there is a menu of options that can <br />be selected with different levels of parking allowed. He stated that a 32-foot width road would <br />allow parking on both sides of the street, whereas parking would only be allowed on one side of <br />the street for the road width proposed. He stated that the main street that goes through this <br />development would be a little wider, whereas the spur roads would be 29 feet in width with no <br />parking on one side of the street. <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson commented that he has been plowing snow for the City this season and <br />the narrower roads can be tough, therefore he would support wider streets where possible. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented that she would also prefer a wider road. She asked if there <br />would be sidewalks, and whether that would be on one side or both sides. She also asked if there <br />would be fencing between the homes and solar garden. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill replied that sidewalks would be along one side of the road, as <br />required by the City. He stated that the smaller lot homes will be adjacent to the solar garden and <br />noted that he would allow the developer to provide details on the buffering between those homes <br />and solar garden. <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />Tom Bakritges, Capstone Homes, acknowledged the landowners noting that the Pearson family <br />has trusted them with developing a project to preserve their legacy. He also expressed appreciation <br />to City staff, the Commissions and City Council for the communication and cooperation <br />throughout the past year of planning. He stated that the overall site is about 78 acres and it was <br /> <br />Planning Commission/ January 7, 2021 <br />Page 11 of 20 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.