Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />12/13/2019 <br />ideas can help the <br /> <br /> <br />mitigation <br />uses. These findings help strengthen <br /> <br />D. Optional. Rules do not require findings for <br />- <br />.5. Optional. This list of <br /> 3.42.Aconditional protection for PCAs and PRCVs in reviewing conditional use applications by providing clarity on what it means to find that the conditional use is consistent with the <br /> purpose of this section, chapter, or article. 3zoning authority make decisions on appropriate mitigation that will reduce impacts from approved variances and conditional uses. <br /> <br />Commentary 3.41. Optional. Including a reference to optional Section 3.5 provides the zoning authority with a list of mitigation ideas to consider for specific applications. <br />nd, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />: <br />and <br />; <br />5 <br />(section, chapter, or <br />shall evaluate the <br />shall <br /> <br />(section, chapter or <br />ire conditions to mitigate the <br />identified resources). <br />- <br /> <br /> <br />12 <br />, required under this <br />s <br />consistent with Section 3. <br />, <br />MRCCA plan <br /> <br />and must consider the potential impacts on <br />use <br />462.3595 <br />and interim <br /> <br />; <br />onal to the impacts <br />, governing body, or other appropriate term) <br /> <br />and if negative impacts are found, requ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />corridor views, and other resources identified in the MRCCA plan. In <br /> <br />All conditional egetation <br />er <br /> <br />. <br />riv <br /> <br />zoning authority <br />( <br />permits <br />(zoning authority, governing body, or other appropriate term) <br />use will not be detrimental to PCAs and PRCVs nor will it contribute to negative <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Minnesota Statutes, section <br />. <br />se <br />of existing v <br /> <br /> <br />The <br />. <br />ows <br /> <br />that are related to and proporti <br /> <br />, as foll <br />) <br />reservation <br />The extent, location and intensity of the conditional use will be in substantial compliance with the <br />and interim u <br /> MRCCA Plan;The conditional use is consistent with the character and management purpose of the MRCCA district in which it is located;The conditionalincremental impacts to PCAs and PRCVs <br /> when considered in the context of past, present and reasonable future actions; andThe conditional use will not negatively impact (otherRestoration of vegetation identified as “vegetation <br /> restoration priorities” identified in the MRCCA plan.PStormwater runoff management;Reducing impervious surface; Increasing structure setbacks;Wetland and drainageway restoration and/or <br /> preservation; andAnd other conservation measures. <br /> <br />must comply with <br /> <br />impacts Make written findings that the conditional use is consistent with the purpose of this article A.B.C.D.A.B.C.D.E.F.G. <br />valuate the impacts to these resources <br />E <br /> <br />3.41 3.42 <br />Conditional article),primary conservation areas, public reviewing the application, the impacts to PCAs, PRCVs, and other resources identified in the MRCCA Plan, and if negative impacts <br /> are fourequire conditions to mitigate the impacts that are related to and proportional to the impacts. Mitigation may include: <br />Conditions of Approval <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />3.4 <br />3.5 <br />Ordinance Language <br /> <br /> <br />