Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Motion by Councilmember Musgrove, seconded by Councilmember Specht, to introduce <br />Ordinance #21-08 amending Chapter 10, Article III, eliminating Section 10-57 – Individual Dog <br />Licensing and rewording of Section 10-58 – Tags. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Riley asked if the additional suggestion could be added to this <br />motion. City Administrator Ulrich commented that is a separate ordinance, so the change would <br />come back. Police Chief Katers stated that it would be a clean-up item and would like to also <br />introduce that tonight. City Administrator Ulrich clarified that the language could be added to the <br />motion. Councilmember Musgrove clarified the language of her motion and Councilmember <br />Specht reconfirmed his second. The updated motion is as follows: <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Musgrove, seconded by Councilmember Specht, to introduce <br />Ordinance #21-08 amending Chapter 10, Article III, eliminating Section 10-57 – Individual Dog <br />Licensing and rewording of Section 10-58 – Tags with the addition of the proposed changes to <br />Section 10-65.1 as recommended by the City Attorney. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Kuzma, Councilmembers Musgrove, Specht, Howell, Riley, <br />and Woestehoff. Voting No: None. <br />7.02: Adopt Resolution #21-007 Approving Preliminary Plat for Northfork Meadows, Case <br />of Lennar (Project #20-135) <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill reviewed the staff report and recommendation of the Planning <br />Commission to adopt Resolution #21-007. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley stated that along the eastern edge there are 80-foot lots, which are allowed <br />by zoning. He asked if the proposed buffering would also be allowed per zoning. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill confirmed both those statements to be true. He stated that the <br />proposed lots meet the minimum lot size requirements and also include the 35-foot buffer area, <br />which the City would own under fee title. He explained that the City has learned that easement <br />over private property is not the preferred method for that purpose. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked for more information on the strip of land and asked how the <br />developer would construct the berm on that area if it will be an outlot owned by the City. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill replied that similar to other public improvements, the <br />developer is required to build the improvement which would then be deeded to the City. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked when the transfer to the City would occur and how that would <br />impact the typical two-year tree guarantee period. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill replied that typically the development agreements include <br />three years of maintenance and replacement of landscaping by the developer. <br /> <br />City Council / February 8, 2021 <br />Page 4 of 12 <br /> <br />