My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 01/26/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2021
>
Minutes - Council - 01/26/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:58:33 AM
Creation date
2/26/2021 1:22:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/26/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />7. COUNCIL BUSINESS <br />7.01: Adopt Resolution #21-027 Approving Request for Interest (RFI) for a Dynamic <br />Display Billboard for Retail Advertising on Highway 10 Near The COR <br /> <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan reviewed the staff report and recommendation of the <br />EDA that the City Council begin a process seeking interest in construction of a dynamic display <br />billboard on Highway 10. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley referenced the cost of the sign and asked if that would be funded through <br />private investment rather than by the City. <br /> <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan confirmed that the City would ask the developer to <br />incur the cost. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff asked if the sign would meet the current requirements for average <br />signage if it were located on private property. <br /> <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan stated that included in the RFI there is language related <br />to adjusting or working within the sign ordinance. He commented that he would imagine that the <br />City would need to potentially tweak the regulation if it makes sense. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that she believes this action would be premature. She asked if <br />the plan would be for this to be located on private or public land. <br /> <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan commented that the City would be asking these <br />companies to provide suggestions as to the best placement of the sign. He stated that the goal <br />would be to have companies present information that the City could evaluate, and this would not <br />commit the City to any action. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that the design process for Highway 10 will provide a <br />better understanding of the right-of-way needs, which could also create opportunities. He stated <br />that he understands the concern but recognized that this process would take time and the right-of- <br />way needs should be known by that time. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma commented that he saw the presentation at the EDA meeting, and this would really <br />help the businesses in Ramsey to have that additional exposure opportunity and therefore he would <br />be interested in receiving proposals. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if it would be more favorable to change the restrictions for <br />business signage rather than having those businesses pay for space on a billboard. She asked if <br />the sign ordinance is too restrictive. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma stated that the EDA did not discuss that and instead focused on what the dynamic <br />sign could bring. He commented that the sign would sell to national chains but would also make <br />advertising available on a scale that small businesses could support. He stated that this process <br />City Council / January 26, 2021 <br />Page 4 of 13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.