Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Motion by Councilmember Howell, seconded by Councilmember Specht, to Adopt Resolution <br />#21-023 Approving Plans and Specifications and Authorizing Advertisements for Bid for 2021 <br />Crack Seal Improvements, Improvement Project #21-06. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Kuzma, Councilmembers Howell, Specht, Musgrove, Riley, <br />and Woestehoff. Voting No: None. <br />7.04: Introduce Ordinance #21-01 Amending City Code Sections 117-111 (R-1 Residential <br />District) and 117-112 (R-2 Residential District) Clarifying Sub-Districts Based on Lot <br />Size <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill reviewed the staff report and recommendation of the Planning <br />Commission to adopt Ordinance #21-01. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley asked for additional information as this would appear to move 50 foot lots <br />from R-2 to R-1. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill replied that the Council would still dictate where the <br />subdistrict would go through rezoning. He stated that staff was finding that the 50-foot-wide lots <br />were not reaching the density range in R-2 and therefore it better fits in the density allowed in R- <br />1. He confirmed that the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this issue and <br />recommended approval. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked the difference between R-1-1 and R-1-3. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill recognized that there was a typo noting that it should state <br />MUSA-80, MUSA-65, and MUSA-50. He stated that staff would make that correction before the <br />ordinance comes back for adoption. He stated that by default, R-1 would remain at 80-foot-wide <br />lots and if something less is requested, the developer would still need to go through a rezoning <br />request. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that this references residential MUSA areas and asked if there <br />are areas outside of that. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill confirmed that there are other areas outside of residential <br />MUSA that would remain unchanged. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht asked if this change would make it easier for developers to request this <br />smaller lot size. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that this change would not impact the City’s ability to <br />remain more restrictive, it simply provides another tool in the box for the City. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff commented that this change would clean up the zoning map and <br />would not change anything. He noted that R-1 would become all single family, R-2 would be <br />City Council / January 26, 2021 <br />Page 7 of 13 <br /> <br />