My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/26/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 01/26/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2026 11:37:59 AM
Creation date
3/2/2021 10:16:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/26/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1296
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Riverstone South EAW <br />Draft — December 2020 <br />Site Plan (Figure 3, Appendix A), these slopes are proposed to be developed into residential lots <br />and a street. The area of 12-14% slopes will be graded and recontoured as part of project <br />construction. <br />Development of the project area will disturb more than one acre of land and therefore will require <br />application for coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal <br />System (NPDES/SDS) General Permit administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency <br />(MPCA) prior to initiation of earthwork. In compliance with the General NPDES Permit for <br />construction activities, the project proponent and construction contractor will need to implement Best <br />Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce erosion and sedimentation and stabilize exposed soils after <br />construction. Erosion and sedimentation control BMPs related to stormwater runoff are discussed in <br />greater detail within Item 11.b.ii. <br />NOTE: For silica sand projects, the EA W must include a hydrogeologic investigation assessing the potential <br />groundwater and surface water effects and geologic conditions that could create an increased risk of potentially <br />significant effects on groundwater and surface water. Descriptions of water resources andpotential effects from <br />the project in EA W Item 11 must be consistent with the geology, soils and topography/land forms and potential <br />effects described in EA W Item 10. <br />11. Water Resources <br />a. Describe surface water and groundwater features on or near the site in a. i. and a. ii. below. <br />i. Surface water - lakes, streams, wetlands, intermittent channels, and county/judicial ditches. Include <br />any special designations such as public waters, trout stream/lake, wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl <br />feeding/resting lake, and outstanding resource value water. Include water quality impairments or <br />special designations listed on the current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List that are within I mile of <br />the project. Include DNR Public Waters Inventory number(s), if any. <br />The project area does not include any surface waters, wetlands, streams, or channels. The site has <br />sandy soils and drains overland toward the Mississippi River. The National Wetlands Inventory <br />shows one PFOlA wetland onsite (Figure 8) and soils mapping shows the entire site mapped as non- <br />hydric and predominantly non-hydric soils (Table 4, Figure 7). Kjolhaug Environmental Services <br />(KES) reviewed the site in the field for wetlands on October 19, 2019 and determined that the site <br />include no wetland. At that time, the site consisted mostly of cornfield and woodland. The <br />woodland was dominated by oak and elm trees and did not contain any depressions dominated by <br />hydrophytic plants. Aerial photographs of the cropland were reviewed for wetland signatures using <br />guidance from the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) and the U.S. Army Corps <br />of Engineers (USAGE). The aerial photograph review found the cropland did not have any areas <br />with enough wetland signatures to warrant a field review. Nevertheless, soils were sampled in two <br />locations that showed some wetland signatures. Non-hydric sandy soils were found at both sample <br />points and KES concluded that the site does not include any wetlands. <br />The Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization (LRRWMO) concurred with the no <br />wetland determination on November 21, 2019 and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) sent <br />a letter concurring that the site does not include aquatic resources on June 15, 2020. Appendix B <br />includes the site assessment for wetlands and concurrence with the no wetland determination from <br />wetland agencies. The Mississippi River is a MN DNR public watercourse and is located about 666 <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.